Author(s):
Kalyani Sanjaykumar Patil, Javesh K. Patil, J. K. Patil, S. P. Pawar
Email(s):
kalyanipatil1820@gmail.com
DOI:
10.52711/2231-5675.2026.00035
Address:
Kalyani Sanjaykumar Patil1*, Javesh K. Patil1, J. K. Patil2, S. P. Pawar3
1P.S.G.V.P Mandal's College of Pharmacy, Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar, Maharashtra, India.
2Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, P.S.G.V.P Mandal's College of Pharmacy, Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar, Maharashtra, India.
3P.S.G.V.P Mandal's College of Pharmacy, Shahada, Dist. Nandurbar, Maharashtra, India.
*Corresponding Author
Published In:
Volume - 16,
Issue - 3,
Year - 2026
ABSTRACT:
Vonoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker widely used for the management of acid-related gastrointestinal disorders. Although the chemical structures of vonoprazan have been elucidated, a systematic toxicological evaluation has not been reported in public literature. In the present study, an in-silico toxicological risk assessment was conducted for two major degradation products of vonoprazan namely N-dealkylated vonoprazan (DP1) and vonoprazan aldehyde (DP2) using QSAR methodologies recommended under ICH M7(R2) for mutagenicity assessment, along with additional evaluation of other toxicity endpoints for broader toxicological understanding. A complementary quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) strategy was employed, as recommended under ICH M7(R2), integrating statistical-based predictions (ADMETlab), expert rule-based structural alert analysis (ToxTree), and additional consensus modeling using the Online Chemical Modeling Environment (OCHEM). Mutagenicity, carcinogenicity, and selected organ toxicity endpoints were evaluated for the intact degradation products as well as relevant structural fragments. DP1 was consistently predicted to be non-mutagenic and non-carcinogenic across all applied models and was therefore classified as an ICH M7 Class 5 (non-mutagenic) impurity, permitting control under standard ICH Q3B(R2) limits. In contrast, DP2 triggered structural alerts for potential genotoxicity due to the presence of an aldehyde functionality and was classified as an ICH M7 Class 3 impurity. However, in-silico metabolic assessment indicated rapid oxidation of DP2 to the corresponding carboxylic acid metabolite, which was devoid of genotoxic and carcinogenic alerts, supporting a mitigated toxicological risk. This study establishes a robust, toxicological framework aligned with ICH M7(R2) principles for mutagenicity assessment for the safety evaluation and control of vonoprazan degradation products and provides a scientifically justified basis for impurity specification setting and regulatory risk management in pharmaceutical development.
Cite this article:
Kalyani Sanjaykumar Patil, Javesh K. Patil, J. K. Patil, S. P. Pawar. An Extensive Analysis of HPLC Techniques for Metformin Hydrochloride Quantitative Analysis. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2026; 16(3):229-2. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2026.00035
Cite(Electronic):
Kalyani Sanjaykumar Patil, Javesh K. Patil, J. K. Patil, S. P. Pawar. An Extensive Analysis of HPLC Techniques for Metformin Hydrochloride Quantitative Analysis. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2026; 16(3):229-2. doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2026.00035 Available on: https://ajpaonline.com/AbstractView.aspx?PID=2026-16-3-11
REFERENCE:
1. Musi N, Hirshman MF, Nygren J, Svanfeldt M, Bavenholm P. O, et al. Metformin increases AMP-Activated protein kinase activity in skeletal muscle of subjects with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes. 2002; 2074: 51
2. Kar M, Choudhury M., HPLC method for estimation of metformin hydrochloride in formulated Microspheres and tablet dosage form. Indian J Pharmaceutical Sci. 2009; 71: 318e20.
3. Al-Rawashdeh, S. Z., and Bangash, R. F. Development of a validated HPLC method for determination of metformin in pharmaceutical formulations and human plasma. J Chromatogr Sci. 2012; 50(3): 203-209. DOI: 10.1093/chromsci/50.3.203
4. Patel, D. R., and Prajapati, R. R. Stability-indicating RP-HPLC method for determination of metformin hydrochloride in bulk drug and its dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2015; 7(6): 295-300. DOI: 10.22159/ijpps.2015v7i6.10860
5. Shah, V. P., et al. Validation of analytical procedures: methodology. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 1998; 17(4-5): 819-829. DOI: 10.1016/S0731-7085(98)00073-2
6. ICH Harmonised Tripartite Guideline. Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology Q2(R1). ICH. 2005. (Not journal DOI; often referenced as guideline)
7. Sirtori, C. R. Metformin: an inexpensive and effective therapy for type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Complications. 2012; 26(6): 514-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.08.006
8. Taneja, S., and Vyas, S. P. A validated HPLC method for simultaneous estimation of metformin hydrochloride and other antidiabetic agents in pharmaceutical formulations. Pharm Methods. 2016; 7(1): 45-51. DOI: 10.5530/phm.2016.1.8
9. https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/14219(accessed on April 2026)
10. Jayashree A. Hiremath, Harish Kumar. A novel RP-HPLC method development and validation for the Qualification of a potential anti-diabetic drug metformin hydrochloride in tablet dosage form. International Journal of Current Pharmaceutical Research. 2022; 14(5).
11. Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M. Viollet B. Metformin: From Mechanisms of Action to Therapies. Cell Metabolism. 2014; 20(6): 953–966.DOI: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.09.018
12. Rena G, Hardie DG, Pearson ER. The Mechanisms of Action of Metformin.Diabetologia. 2017; 60(9): 1577–1585 DOI: 10.1007/s00125-017-4342-z
13. Graham GG, Punt J, Arora M, et al. Clinical pharmacokinetics of metformin. Clinical Pharmacokinetics. 2011; 50(2): 81–98.doi: 10.2165/11534750-000000000-00000
14. Maheshwari Choudhari, Vishal Rasve, Shilpa Khilare, Poonam Ghorpade. Research Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry. 2023:15(3): 241–248 DOI: 10.52711/0975-4385.2023.00038
15. Nilesh Nikam, Avish Maru, Anil Jadhav, Prashant Malpure. Analytical Method Development and Validation of Metformin Hydrochloride by using RP-HPLC with ICH Guidelines. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD). 2019; 3(3).
16. Maruthur NM, Tseng E, Hutfless S, Wilson LM, Suarez-Cuervo C, Berger Z, Chu Y, lyoha E, Segal JB, Bolen S. Diabetes Medications as Monotherapy or Metformin- Based Combination Therapy for Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta- analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2016; 164 (11): 740-51