A Brief Review on Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometry:
The Simultaneous Estimation Method and its Application
Amitkumar J. Vyas1, Dhara U. Desai1*, A. B. Patel1, A. I. Patel1, S.R. Shah1, D. B. Sheth2
1Department of Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance, B.K. Mody Government Pharmacy College Polytechnic Campus, Near Aji Dem, Bhavnagar Road, Rajkot - 360003 Gujarat, India.
2L. M. College of Pharmacy, Navrangpura, Ahmedabad - 380009 Gujarat, India.
*Corresponding Author E-mail: dharadesai3429@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
The dual wavelength spectrophotometry is developed and validated for simultaneous estimation of various combinations of two drugs. Dual wavelength method is used to eliminate interference due to absorbance of other drug at sampling wavelengths for one drug. Two wavelengths are selected for each drug in such a way that the difference in absorbance is zero for the second drug. The principle for dual wavelength method is the absorbance difference between two points on the mixture spectra is directly proportional to the concentration of the component of interest and independent of interfering component. The Following review article contains a brief regarding dual wavelength spectrophotometry introduction, principle, examples and application of different pharmaceutical, organic and inorganic compounds.
KEYWORDS: Dual Wavelength, Simultaneous Estimation, Spectrophotometry, Applications, Absorbance, Pharmaceutical Compound.
INTRODUCTION:
Dual-wavelength spectrophotometry methods can be used to determine an unknown concentration of a component of interest that is present in a mixture containing both the component of interest and an unwanted interfering component by determining the difference in absorbance between two points in the spectrum of the mixture. This method has been useful for the measurement of small changes in absorbance in systems containing high-absorbing backgrounds. It was also a promising analytical technique for suspension analysis.
The prerequisite for the application of a dual-wavelength method is the selection of two wavelengths such that the interfering component shows the same absorbance while the component of interest shows a significant difference in absorbance with changes in concentration. The technique consists of using a reference wavelength to correct for a highly absorbing background. In addition, dual wavelength spectrophotometry requires extremely small quantities of sample for analysis.1 The purpose of stability and related substance study is to provide evidence on how the quality of a drug substance or drug product varies with time under the influence of a variety of environmental factors2-4. HPLC, UV Spectrophotometric methods, and LC-MS/MS methods are essential in ensuring quality control in pharmaceuticals, where substance stability and integrity are crucial for safety and effectiveness5-11. Presence of impurities critically affects the stability and pharmacological action of pharmaceutical API and drug product.12-16. Analytical quality by design [AQbD] and CCD help in regulatory compliance for RP-HPLC method development, stress testing or stability indicating methods17-20.
PRINCIPLE:
Since the dual-wavelength technique is not yet very familiar in analytical chemistry, we shall first of all describe the principle involved.
In dual-wavelength measurement, light from a highly stabilized tungsten-iodide or deuterium lamp is divided into two beams in two grating monochromators. The light beams of different wavelength from the two gratings are time-shared through a single cell by means of a rotating sector, and the difference ∆A between the absorbance at wavelength λ1 and λ2 is measured. Even a very slight change in the absorbance of a sample can thus be determined accurately on using maximum scale expansion range of absorbance because the various sample and cell errors which may occur and its classical spectrophotometry are eliminated: only one cell is used and the radiation at λ1 and λ2 is incident on the same position of the cell.21
Figure 1: Principle of dual wavelength spectrophotometry, L-light source, G1andG2-gratings, P-PMT, r-rotating sector, C- cell
Dual wavelength method "also known a two wavelengths method" facilitates analyzing a component in presence of an interfering component by measuring the absorbance difference (∆A) between two points in the mixture spectrum.
Figure 2: Selection of wavelengths for dual wavelength method.
In dual-wavelength spectrophotometry, the absorbance difference ∆A between two wavelengths λ1 and λ2 is measured as shown in Figure, so that no reference solution is required. The most important prerequisite is a linearity or proportionality between measured signals and concentration of the component under investigation. Thus, many types of background can be eliminated by selecting a suitable combination of two wavelengths.21
In this method one of the drugs is considered as a component of interest and the other drug is considered as an interfering component and vice-versa. The basis for such method is the selection of two wavelengths where the interfering component shows the same absorbance (∆A equals zero) whereas the component of interest shows significant difference in absorbance with concentration. ∆A between two points on the mixture spectra is directly proportional to the concentration of the component of interest independent of interfering component.22
INSTRUMENTAL ASPECTS (ANALYSIS OF MIXTURE):23
Equi-absorbance method:
Suppose that a two-component sample contains x and y. The measured absorbances at each wavelength λ1 and λ2 are
where, εx and εy are the molar absorptivities of the x and y components at λl, respectively εx´ and εy´ are the molar absorptivities of the two components at λ2 and c, are the concentrations (mol/L) of the components.
Then, the absorbance obtained in the dual-wavelength measurement is
If the second component y shows the same absorbance at both wavelengths λ1 and λ2 i.e., if Aλ2 – Aλ1 =0, equation simplifies to
Since the difference absorbance ∆A is now no longer dependent on the concentration of the component y, it is possible to eliminate the influence due to component y.
APPLICATION:
Pharmaceutical Application:
Table 1: Analytical Characteristics of Dual Wavelength Procedure for Simultaneous Determination of Pharmaceutical Compound
S. No |
Compound Name |
Wavelength(λ) (nm) |
Solvent |
Linearity |
Ref |
1 |
Ambroxol HCL and Desloratadine HCL |
253.2 and 258.5 and 301.2 and 314 |
0.1 N HCl |
5-75 μg/ml 5-75 μg/ml |
24 |
2 |
Amoxicillin and potassium clavulanate |
261 and 226 and 279 and 225 |
0.1M NaOH |
10-50 µg/ml 2-10 µg/ml |
25 |
3 |
Atenolol and Indapamide |
266 and 270. 2 and 246.4 and 252.2 |
Methanol
|
100-350 µg/ml 5-17.5 µg/ml |
26 |
4 |
Cilnidipine and Olmesartan Medoxomil |
352.92 and 282.99 and 337.85 |
Methanol |
10-60 μg/ml 20-120 μg/ml |
27 |
5 |
Drotaverine HCL and Aceclofenac |
301.5 and 311.0 and 271.5 and 280.0 |
Methanol |
8‐32 μg/ml 10‐40 μg/ml |
28 |
6 |
Hydrochlorothiazide and Telmisartan |
258 and 299 and 316 and 326 |
0.1 N NaOH |
2-20 μg/ml 2-20 μg/ml |
29 |
7 |
Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide |
242 and 263 and 253 and 284 |
Methanol |
4 -32 μg/ml 2.5-20 μg/ml |
30 |
8 |
Amlodipine and Atorvastatin |
238 and 243.8 and 246.6 and 243.8 |
Methanol
|
4 -40 µg/ml 8-32 µg/ml |
31 |
9 |
Cinnarizine and Domperidone |
240.2 and 273.2 and 230.8 and 259.2 |
Methanol |
40–180 µg/ml 60–120 µg/ml |
32 |
10 |
Clotrimazole and Beclomethasone Dipropionate |
237 and 241 and 259 and 264 |
Methanol |
100-450 µg/ml 6-34 µg/ml |
33 |
11 |
Nitazoxanide and Ofloxacin |
271.5 and 359.5 and 300.5 and 365.5 |
Mixture of dichloromethane and n-Hexane (60:40) |
5-25 μg/ml 2-10 μg/ml |
34 |
12 |
Elbasvir and Grazoprevir |
351 and 315 and 375 and 334.5 |
Methanol |
- |
35 |
13 |
Isbesartan and hydrochlorothiazide |
263.4 and 281 and 243.4 and 247.6 |
0.1 N NaOH |
5-15 μg/ml 4-12 μg/ml |
36 |
14 |
Atorvastatin and Ezetimibe |
228.8 and 240.8 and 232 and 259.2 |
Methanol |
5-50 μg/ml 5-30 μg/ml |
37 |
15 |
Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate |
238 and 256 and 259 and 298 |
Methanol |
5-30 μg/ml 5-30 μg/ml |
38 |
16
|
Ofloxacin and Cefpodoxime proxeil |
224 and 247.4 and 278.2 and 320 |
Methanol |
2-12 μg/ml 4-24 μg/ml |
39 |
17 |
Alogliptin and Pioglitazone |
270 and 265 and 280 and 271 |
Methanol |
- |
40 |
18 |
Avanafil and Dapoxetine hydrochloride |
206.80 and 214.80 and 241.20 and 251.60 |
Methanol |
1-6 μg/ml 1-3.5 μg/ml |
41 |
19 |
Empagliflozin Metformin |
232 and 244 and 224 and 238 |
Methanol |
2–10 μg/ml 4–20 μg/ml |
42 |
20 |
Diclofenac Esomeprazole |
281.7 and 315 262.6 and 301.6 |
Methanol |
5-25 μg/ml 2-10 μg/ml |
43 |
21
|
Paracetamoland Nabumetone |
237.4 and 214.4and 332.6 |
Methanol
|
4 – 20 μg/ml 2 – 20 μg/ml |
44 |
22 |
Ethamsylate and Mefenamic acid |
274.4 and 301.2 and 304.8 and 320.4 |
Methanol |
0-50 μg/ml 0-50 μg/ml |
45 |
23 |
Pyrimethamine and Sulphadoxine |
278 and 295and 246 and 298 |
Methanol
|
3-18 µg/ml 7-42 µg/ml |
46 |
24 |
Paracetamoland Diclofenac sodium |
245 and 249and 257 and 294 |
Urea + distilled water |
5-35 mcg/ml 5-40 mcg/ml |
47 |
25 |
Amlodipine besylateand Metoprolol succinate |
365and 226 and 248.7 |
Water |
2–25 µg/ml 2–30 µg/ml |
48 |
26 |
Naproxenand Esomeprazole Magnesiumtrihydrate |
312 and 298and 314 and 334.2 |
0.1M NaOH |
15-75 µg/ml 2.8-6.0 µg/ml |
49 |
27 |
Metoprolol succinateand Telmisartan |
282.4 and 284.6and 330 |
Methanol
|
3-20 µg/ml 4-16 µg/ml |
50 |
28 |
Carvediloland Hydrochlorothiazide |
238 and 248.8and 266 and 289.4 |
0.1N HCl |
1–10 μg/ml 1–10 μg/ml |
51 |
29 |
Thiocolchicosideand Diclofenac Sodium |
371and 248 and 268 248 nm and 26 |
Methanol |
2–16 μg/ml
12.5–100 μg/ml |
52 |
30 |
Alprazolam and Propranolol Hydrochloride |
258.2 nmand 319.4 nm |
Methanol |
1–40 μg/ml 80–200 µg/mL |
53 |
31 |
Norfloxacinand Tinidazole |
277.2 and 336.2and 309 and 254.6 |
0.01 M HCl |
2-10 μg/ml 4-40 μg/ml |
54 |
32 |
Rivaroxabanand Aspirin |
250 and 286.44and 243.53 and 259.2 |
Acetonitrile |
2 – 12 μg/ml 40-240 μg/ml |
55 |
33 |
Meropenemand sulbactam sodium |
242.0 and 274.0and 285.0 and 306.0 |
0.1N NaOH |
4–24μg/ml 2–12 μg/ml |
56 |
34 |
Amlodipine Besylate and Olmesartan Medoximil |
232 and 241.6and 244 and 255.4 |
Methanol
|
2.5-12.5 μg/ml 5-25 μg/ml |
57 |
35 |
Sofosbuvir and Ledipasvir |
252 and 310.70and 332 and 310.70 |
Methanol |
10- 30 µg/ml 2.25 – 6.75 µg/ml |
58 |
36 |
Amlodipine Besylateand Indapamide |
232 and 242.0and 235 and 245 |
Methanol |
5-25 μg/ml 2-10 μg/ml |
59 |
37 |
Efonidipine hydrochloride ethanolate and Telmisartan |
242.5 and 257.5and 244.5 and 287 |
Methanol |
8-20 μg/ml 16-40 μg/ml |
60 |
38 |
Atorvastatin calciumand Amlodipine besylate |
259.9 and 354and 363 |
50% Methanol |
0-40 µg/ml 0-20 µg/ml |
61 |
39 |
Carbamazepineand Lamotrigine |
304 and 313and 282 and 290 |
Ethanol: Water (2:1) |
1-50 µg/ml 1-80 μg/mL |
62 |
40 |
Emtricitabineand Tenofovir |
230.696 and 250and 250 and 268.670 |
Methanol |
4-32 µg/mL 6-48 µg/mL |
63 |
41 |
Ketotifenand Salbutamol |
284 and 267.84and 315 and 284.59 |
0.1N HCL |
5-25 μg/ml 10- 50 μg/ml |
64 |
42 |
Metoprolol succinate and Olmesartan medoxomil |
225.2 and 258.2and 211 and 229.8 |
- |
5-30 μg/ml 5-30 μg/ml |
65 |
43 |
Losartan potassium and Hydrochlorothiazide |
206.6 and 261.4and 270.6 |
0.1 N HCL |
6.4 -19.2 µg/ml 1.6-4.8 µg/ml |
66 |
44 |
Antipyrine and Benzocaine |
254.1 and 309.1and 230.1 and 263.5 |
Double distilled water |
5–50 μg/ml 1–20 μg/ml |
67 |
45 |
Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride and Metronidazole |
281.5 and 335.5and 313 and 324 |
Methanol |
30-160 mg 30- 160 mg |
68 |
46 |
Dapoxetine hydrochlorideand Sildenafil citrate |
213.2 and 226.09and 242.09 and 271.70 |
Methanol |
2–12 µg/ml 10 - 60 µg/ml |
69 |
47 |
Cilostazol and Telmisartan |
284 and 264.9and 243.4 and 270.6 |
Methanol |
1-40 μg/ml 1-25 μg/ml |
70 |
48 |
Sulphadoxine and Trimethoprim |
274.2 and 299.5and 238.1 and 300.1 |
Methanol |
- |
71 |
49 |
Phenylephrine hydrochloride and Tropicamide |
260.8 and 268.2and 245.4 and 271.8 |
0.1N HCl |
25-125 mg/ml 4-20 mg/ml |
72 |
50 |
Trimetazidine hydrochloride and Metoprolol succinate |
264.20 and 282.60and 280 and 260 |
Water |
40-200 μg/ml 54-270 μg/ml |
73 |
Table 2: Analytical characteristics of dual wavelength procedure for individual determination of pharmaceutical compound
No |
Compound name |
Remarks |
Solvent |
linearity |
Ref |
1. |
Lovastatin |
In fermentation broth of aspergillus terreus 226 and 260 nm |
75% ethanol |
3.20 to 64.0µg/ml |
21 |
2. |
Phenazopyridine hydrochloride |
In the presence of its oxidative degradation product 2,3,6-triaminopyridine (TAP) 425 and 256 nm |
Water |
1-14μg/ml |
74 |
FOOD ANALYSIS:
Determination of calcium by dual wavelength spectrophotometry:
Table 3: Determination of calcium by dual wavelength spectrophotometry:
S. No. |
Compound |
Reagent |
Wavelength |
Linearity |
Ref |
1 |
Calcium in milk |
Calcium + Chrome black T – polyethylene glycol in an alkaline buffer |
558 and 645nm |
0-4.8µg/ml |
75 |
2 |
Calcium in food |
Calcium + arsenazo I + NH3-NH4Cl buffer (PH:9.5) Form a purple complex |
480 and 570nm |
0-1.3µg/ml |
76 |
Determination of citric acid and ascorbic acid in Vit. C tablet:77
Acids reacts with copper (2) – ammonium complex
Cu+2 – NH3 complex decomposed Cu+2- citrate complex
by
citrate
λmax=600 nm λmax=750 nm
range: 1-125 mM range: 1-35 Mm
Determination of Reducing Sugar in Black Liquor:78
The lignin will drag interference in the system of the sugar determination. Dual wavelength spectrophotometry can remove the interference when making use of the DNS to detect the reducing sugar content in the black liquor.
The dual-wavelength spectrophotometric method has advantages of good accuracy and precision, high sensitivity and simultaneous determination of multi-component, so Use DNS dual-wavelength spectrophotometric determination of reducing sugar content of black liquor, select the 520 and 570nm test wavelength can exclude the interference of lignin.
From the relation curves between the absorbency of the lignin and its concentration at 520nm and 570nm, the magnification coefficient of the differential signal was defined as K2=5.338, K1=3. 288. The correction index k=1.2. Then the concentration C(g/L) of the glucose solution can be figured out through formula C=(S/k-0.0165) × M/0.821.Then a group of glucose solution with same glucose addition but different lignin addition had been measured.
Separation and purification of amylose and amylopectin from cassava starch and content determination:79
The amylose and amylopectin in cassava starch were separated by n-butanol crystallization method. The purity of amylose and amylopectin was characterized by blue value of starch-iodine complex. According to principle of dual wavelength spectrophotometric method, the contents of amylose and amylopectin in cassava starch were determined at selected wavelengths of 624 nm and 538nm with respective reference wavelengths of 440nm and 750nm.
SOIL ANALYSIS:
Determination of nitrate in soil extract80:
A rapid method is described for determining nitrate concentration in a soil extract solution based on its UV absorbance at 210nm. The interference of non-nitrate species is accounted for by subtracting an empirically-determined multiple of the absorbance of the extract solution at 270nm from its absorbance at 210nm. The value of the multiplication factor, R, is calculated from the 210: 270nm absorbance ratio of the extract solution after it has been treated with Raney-Nickel catalyst to remove nitrate. The method was tested using 10 Illinois soils. The composite value of R for these soils was 3.05 ±0.22. This value, as well as each individual value of R for the respective soils, was used to calculate the nitrate concentration. The results were then compared to one another and to results obtained by the steam distillation method.
INORGANIC ANALYSIS:81
Spectrophotometry usually involves the formation of a complex of the trace element with a selective ligand reagent that, as a metal-ligand complex, absorbs light in the visible and UV regions. Spectrophotometry is still used for the rapid determination of copper, iron, and of other metals such as Cr (VI) in environmental samples because Spectrophotometry is a conventional and inexpensive technique.
Analytical characteristics of dual wavelength procedure for individual determination
Table 4: Analytical characteristics of dual wavelength procedure for individual determination
S. No |
Compound |
Reagents |
Remarks |
Ref |
1 |
Copper in waste water |
Erichrome blue black R (EBBR) |
550 and 660 nm(λ) PH 12 |
82 |
2 |
Sulphide in domestic water |
Coloured complex solution (Ag+ + triton-x-100 + cadion 2B + sodium tertraborate solution |
446 and 556 nm (λ) PH 9.2 |
83 |
3 |
Arsenic (III) in waste water |
Ethyl violet |
560 and 630 nm (λ) PH 6-7 |
84 |
4 |
Mercury (II) in water |
4-(2-thiazolylazo) resorcinol |
442 and 547 nm |
85 |
5 |
Iron (III) in rocks |
Diantipyrinylmethane (DAPM) |
388 and 470 nm Produced red-brown complex in acidic media |
86 |
6 |
Titanium (IV) in rocks |
Diantipyrinylmethane (DAPM) |
388 and 514.9 nm Produced yellow complex in acidic media |
86 |
7 |
Chromium (VI)in waste water |
Rhodamine B and phenol red |
430 and 550 nm |
87 |
8 |
Germanium in ashes |
Salycyl fluorone |
466 and 504 nm |
88 |
9 |
Methylmercury in fish tissue |
Dithizone |
475 and 628 nm |
89 |
10 |
hydrogen peroxide in the wood pulp bleaching streams |
Molybdate solution |
297 and 350 nm |
90 |
Determination of nickel in the presence of cobalt91:
When nickel is to be determined, λ1 is set to the absorbance maximum for the nickel ion, 397nm and λ2 is changed several times until a constant level is obtained, when solutions containing suitable amounts of cobalt are used. The preliminary testing for the determination of nickel in the presence of cobalt as perchlorate is shown in Fig. From these results, the most suitable combination of λ1 and λ2 is seen to be 397 and 620nm; with this combination, ∆A for cobalt is zero or negligible, so that the interference of cobalt can be eliminated completely.
Procedure: To a slightly acidic solution containing 5mg of nickel and various amounts of cobalt, add 5ml of 70% perchloric acid, and dilute to 25ml with water. Measure the absorbance at 397 vs. 620nm in a 1-cm cell.
The dual-wavelength technique in inorganic spectrophotometry with highly sensitive chromogenic reagents:
Many highly sensitive chromogenic reagents for metals with molar absorptivity’s of the order of 105 are now known. the analogs of 4-( 2-pyriclylazo)- l.3 diaminobenzene (PADAB) are used for the determination of micro- amounts of cobalt.
In conventional method the net absorbance at maximum wavelength against water or reagent is measured. In dual-wavelength measurements λ1 is set to the wavelength for the absorption peak of the chelate and λ2 to the wavelength for the absorption peak of the reagent.
Procedure: To a 25ml volumetric flask transfer a suitable aliquot of sample solution containing up to 0.1 p.p.m of cobalt. and add 0.1-0.2 ml of ethanolic 0.05% reagent solution. Adjust to pH 5.0 with 0.2 M sodium Acetate-O.2 M acetic acid buffer solution, and mix. Then add 10 ml of hydrochloric acid. dilute to volume. and mix. Measure the absorbance for λ1 588 nm and λ2 425 nm.
The dual-wavelength method increases the apparent molar absorptivity of the cobalt-5-Cl-PADAB complex
DUAL WAVELENGTH SPECTROPHOTOMETRY: AS A DIAGNOSTIC TEST OF THE PULP CHAMBER CONTENT92
Dual wavelength spectrophotometry is a method that has previously been considered as a diagnostic tool to determine pulp status. Pulse oximetry is a method based on dual wavelength spectrophotometry technology.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to determine the feasibility of using dual wavelength spectrophotometry to identify teeth with pulp chambers that are either empty, filled with fixed pulp tissue, or filled with oxygenated blood.
In phase I (human tooth model) of the experiment, a human third molar was prepared so that its pulp space could be filled with oxygenated blood and later emptied.
In phase II (dog tooth model), the lower jaw of a beagle dog was removed and placed in formalin, thereby fixing the pulps of the teeth. The pulp of the right canine was removed via an apical approach, and attachments were placed in a similar position to those on the human tooth, to allow filling and emptying of the pulp space. Cavit was placed over the exposed fixed pulp in the left canine. Ten readings, which were separated by light source and detector removal and replacement, were taken of the right canine pulp space when it was empty or filled with oxygenated blood, or the left canine pulp space when it was filled with fixed tissue. Distinct and reproducible changes were measured for pulp spaces filled with air, tissue, or oxygenated blood.
In phase III (stimulated pulp testing on dog teeth model), Blood was introduced into the root canal space, the chamber was rinsed with water and replaced with air, according to a predetermined code.
The continuous dual wavelength spectrophotometer used in this study was designed to noninvasively monitor oxygenation changes in muscle. The instrument detects the presence or absence of oxygenated blood at 760 nm and 850 nm. The identification of pulpal contents was correctly determined in all 20 of the predetermined conditions. The findings indicate that continuous wave spectrophotometry may become a useful pulp testing method.
CONCLUSION:
A simple rapid spectrophotometric method for the determination of two component systems by means of a dual-wavelength method is described. By proper selection of the combination of two wavelengths λ1 and λ2, one component can be masked instrumentally even when its concentration varies. The component to be determined is measured as follows: two light beams of different wavelengths λ1 and λ2 from two gratings are time-shared through a single cell by means of a rotating sector and the difference between the absorbance at wavelengths λ1 and λ2 is measured.
The ability of double-wavelength spectroscopy to extend the proven effectiveness of uv-vis absorption spectroscopic techniques by overcoming limitations in selectivity has been demonstrated certainly in the field of biochemistry but also in general analytical spectrophotometry. Since the fundamental advantage of double-wavelength spectroscopy is its capability of reducing interferences by one dimension, many unsolved analytical problems, both qualitative and quantitative, can potentially be solved with presently available instrumentation.
REFERENCES:
1. Dha Shi-Weng Li, Hong-Ping Song et al. Rapid determination of lovastatin in the fermentation broth of Aspergillus terreus using dual-wavelength UV spectrophotometry. Pharm Biol. 2014; 52(1): 129–135.
2. Rathod N et al., Analytical Method Development and Validation of Stability Indicating Method and Related Substance by Using RP-HPLC of Drug Substance. Pharma Science Monitor. 2017; 8(2): 409-419.
3. Taviyad Mittal et al., Chromatographic Method Development and Validation for Related Substance. Pharma Science Monitor 2017; 8(2): 32-39.
4. Chirag D. Jadav et al., Review on Stability Indicating Assay Method or Forced Degradation study: Strategy and Regulatory Consideration. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2023; 13 (2): 131-139.
5. Dhruvi U Parmar et al., Strategic approach for HPLC method Development and validation: Review, Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2023; 14(1): 71-76.
6. Shalini A. Jha et al., Review on simultaneous equation method (Vierodt's method). Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(2). doi: 10.52711/2231-5675.2022.00026
7. Harshal M. Vadile et al., Recent Applications of UV-Visible Derivative Spectroscopic Method. 2023; 13(2): 108-114.
8. Brijesh H Patel et al., A brief review on q-absorption ratio method in UV-spectrophotometry. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(4): 281-285.
9. Sonali B. Mishra et al., A Brief Review on Liquid Chromatography- Mass Spectrometry/LCMS and its Application. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2022; 12(3): 203-210.
10. Anjana Vaghela et al., Sample preparation in bioanalysis: a review. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research. 2016; 5(5): 6-10.
11. Kishna Ram et al., sensitive and simple LC-MS/MS method development and validation for estimation of phenytoin in human plasma by using deuterated internal standard. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(6): 2937-2944.
12. Asnani A.H et al, A brief review on genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2021; 11(3): 187-193.
13. Godhaniya, J.P, et al, A review on carcinogenic impurities found in marketed drugs and strategies for its determination by analytical methods. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(2): 159-169.
14. Bundheliya et al, A Review on Metal Impurities in Pharmaceuticals. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 2021; 11(3): 212-222.
15. Megha Rajput et al., Determination of genotoxic Impurity by Chromatographic Method, Pharma Science Monitor Year. 2017; 8(2): 24-31.
16. Anjali K. Mandavia et al. Nitrosamine Impurity: Management of Unwelcome Guest in Pharma Market. for publication in Year: 2023; 13(4): 303-308.
17. Patel S.M et al. Stability testing: An Essential study for Vaccine Formulation Development. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research. 2022; 12(1): 29-36.
18. Visana N.M et al. Analytical quality by design in stress testing or stability-indicating method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(2): 170-178.
19. Gol Dhruvanshi et al. Implementing Analytical Quality by Design (AQbD) Approach for Simultaneous Estimation of Tadalafil and Macitentan by RP-HPLC Method. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2021; 11(4): 539-552.
20. Prajapati Krupa et al. RP-HPLC Method for Determination of Gemifibrozil using Central composite design (CCD). Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(6): 3009-3014.
21. Shozo Shibata. Dual-Wavelength Spectrophotometry. Angewandte Chemie. 1976; 15(11): 673–679.
22. Amira H. Kamal, Samah F. El-Malla et al. A review on uv spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous multicomponent analysis. EJPMR. 2016; 3(2): 348-360.
23. Porro, T. J. Double-wavelength spectroscopy. Analytical Chemistry. 1972; 44(4): 93A–103a.
24. Sharma E. A. and Shah N. J. Development and Validation of Dual Wavelength UV Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Ambroxol Hydrochloride and Desloratadine Hydrochloride in their Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Int J Pharm Sci Res. 2012; 3(8): 2584-2589.
25. Akhilesh Gupta, Rajkumar et al. Simultaneous estimation of amoxycillin and potassium clavulanate in injection formulation by dual wavelength spectrophotometry. Drug Invention Today. 2011; 3(4): 33-34.
26. N. Fernandes et al. Dual wavelength and Simultaneous equation Spectrophotometric methods for estimation of Atenolol and Indapamide in their combined dosage form. Int. J. Chem. Sci. 2008; 1: 29-35.
27. Isha J. Soni, Hiral J. Panchal. Development and Validation of Dual Wavelength UV Spectrophotometric Method for simultaneous estimation of Cilnidipine and Olmesartan Medoxomil in Tablet dosage form. Indian J. Pharm. Biol. Res. 2014; 2(1): 76-81.
28. Jyotesh Jain Et Al. Dual wavelength spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of drotaverine hydrochloride and aceclofenac in their combined tablet dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2010; 2(4): 76-79.
29. Rekha Gangola, Narendra Singh et al. Spectrophotometric simultaneous determination of hydrochlorothiazide and telmisartan in combined dosage form by dual wavelength method. Pharmacie Globale (IJCP). 2011; 2(4): 1-3.
30. K. I. lango, Shiji Kumar.P.S. Simultaneous Determination of Olmesartan Medoxomil and Hydrochlorothiazide by Area Under Curve and Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometric Methods. J. Pharm. Sci. and Res. 2012; 4(10): 1946 – 1949.
31. Hany W. Darwish, Said A. Hassan et al. Three different methods for determination of binary mixture of Amlodipine and Atorvastatin using dual wavelength spectrophotometry. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2013; 104: 70–76.
32. Maha M. Abdelrahman. Simultaneous determination of Cinnarizine and Domperidone by area under curve and dual wavelength spectrophotometric methods. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2013.
33. Komal R Dhudashia, Amit V Patel et al. Simultaneous UV Spectrophotometric Estimation of Clotrimazole and Beclomethasone Dipropionate in Their Combined Dosage Forms by Q-absorption Ratio, Dual Wavelength and First Order Derivative Method. Inventi Impact: Pharm Ana and Qual Assur. 2012; 2: 94-97.
34. Shailendra Bindaiya, Shravan Bankey et al. Simultaneous Determination of Nitazoxanide and Ofloxacin in Tablet by Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry (Dual Wavelength Method). Int.J. ChemTech Res. 2010; 2(1): 11-15.
35. Attia, K. A, El-Abasawi, N. M et al. Application of Different Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Elbasvir and Grazoprevir in Pharmaceutical Preparation. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2018; 189: 154-160.
36. Syahputra Hafid, Muchlisyam Masfria. Determination Of Simultaneous Isbesartan and Hydrochlorothiazide by Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry with Dual Wavelength Method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Development. 2019; 7(3): 1-4.
37. R. Savithri, N. H. S. Bindu et al. Dual Wavelength Uv-Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Atorvastatin and Ezetimibe in Bulk and Their Combined Tablet Dosage Form. Chemistry. 2011.
38. R. N. Kane. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Estimation of Atorvastatin and Fenofibrate in Bulk Drug and Dosage Form by Using Dual Wavelength Method. Chemistry. 2012.
39. A. Patel Sanket, A. Satish. Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Ofloxacin and Cefpodoxime Proxetil in Tablet Dosage Form. Material Science. 2011.
40. R. Kashyap, U. Srinivasa. First Order Derivative and Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometry Methods Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Alogliptin and Pioglitazone in Bulk and Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014; 6(1): 730-738.
41. R. Kashyap, U. Srinivasa et al. First Order Derivative and Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometry Methods Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Avanafil and Dapoxetine Hydrochloride in Bulk and Dosage Form. International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2014; 6(1): 6418-6438.
42. Sushil Patil, Swapnapurti V Bharambe et al. Spectrophotometric simultaneous determination of empagliflozin and metformin in combined tablet dosage form by absorbance corrected method, area under curve method, and dual wavelength spectrophotometry. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2019; 12(2): 94.
43. Mokhtar M. Mabrouk, Hammad, S. F. et al. Simultaneous Determination of Diclofenac and Esomeprazole by Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography, Dual Wavelength and Derivative Spectrophotometry. Journal of Analytical Chemistry. 2019; 74(5): 458-466.
44. Oza C. K., Nijhawan R., Pandya M. K. et al. Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometric method for simultaneous determination of Paracetamol and Nabumetone in API and in tablet dosage form. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2012; 2(4): 122-127.
45. Anju goyal and I. singhvi. Spectrophotometric estimation of ethamsylate and mefenamic acid from a binary mixture by dual wavelength and simultaneous equation methods. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2008; 70(1): 108-111.
46. S. Meena, S. M. Sandhya. Validated Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Analysis of Pyrimethamine and Sulphadoxine in Pharmaceutical Dosage Forms. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2013; 6(3): 121-123.
47. Rajesh Sharma, Geetam Pathodiya et al. Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Paracetamol and Diclofenac Sodium in Combined Dosage Form by Application of Hydrotropic Solubilization. J. Pharm. Sci. and Res. 2010; 2(12): 821-826.
48. Kamal A. H, Hammad S. F And Kamel D. N. Chemometric Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Metoprolol Succinate and Amlodipine Besylate in Their Tablet Formulation. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2012; 254.
49. Chandrakant Sojitra, Abhishek Pathak et al. Development and Validation of Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Naproxen and Esomeprazole Magnesiumtrihydrate in Combined Pharmaceutical Formulation. Int.J. ChemTech Res. 2012; 4(2): 602-608.
50. Mayur Modi, Rikin Shah et al. Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of metoprolol succinate and telmisartan in combined pharmaceutical formulation. IJPSR. 2012; 3(5): 1348-1354.
51. Nada S. Abdelwahab. Spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of Carvedilol and Hydrochlorothiazide in combined dosage form. Arabian Journal of Chemistry. 2016; 9: S355–S360.
52. Vanparia D.J., Shah S.A., et al. Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Thiocolchicoside and Diclofenac Sodium in Their Combined Dosage Form. Asian Journal of Research in Chemistry. 2011; 4(1):123-127.
53. Patel, D. C, Patel, N. R et al. Development and Validation Of RP-HPLC, HPTLC And Uv-Visible Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Estimation of Alprazolam and Propranolol Hydrochloride in Their Combined Dosage Form. Journal Of Analytical Chemistry. 2014; 69(7): 674-680.
54. Kamal A. H and El-Malla, S. F. Factor space analysis and dual wavelength spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of norfloxacin and tinidazole in tablet. Analytical Chemistry Letters. 2018; 8(3): 393-404.
55. Heba Zhdan and Nazira Sarkis. Dual Wavelength and First Order Derivative Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Rivaroxaban and Aspirin in Synthetic Mixture. International Research Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry. 2020; 21(24): 48-54.
56. Kuldip R. Marwada, Jigar B. Patel et al. Ultraviolet spectrophotometry (dual wavelength and chemometric) and high-performance liquid chromatography for simultaneous estimation of meropenem and sulbactam sodium in pharmaceutical dosage form. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2014; 124: 292–299.
57. Kalpana Chauhan, Jinay Shah et al. Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of amlodipine besylate and olmesartan medoxomil in combined dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012; 4(4): 337-441.
58. Suryaprakash Y. Rai, Yural Prajapati et al. Development and validation of rp-hplc and uv spectroscopy methods for simultaneous estimation of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir in their combined tablet dosage form. Pharma Science Monitor 8(2), An International Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. 2017: 369-388.
59. Jinay Shah, Parul Parmar et al. Development and validation of spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of amlodipine besylate and indapamide in combined dosage form. Int J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2012; 4(3); 257-261.
60. Shreya D. Adeshra, Grishma H. Patel et al. Development and validation of three novel UV spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous estimation of efonidipine hydrochloride ethanolate and telmisartan in their synthetic mixture and its comparison using ANOVA. J. Med. Chem. Sci. 2021; 4(2): 145-153.
61. M. R. Khan and Deepti Jain. Simultaneous spectrophotometric determination of atorvastatin calcium and amlodipine besylate in tablets. Indian J Pharm Sci. 2006; 68(4): 546-548.
62. Fadhil M. Najib, Muhammad S. Mustafa. Four spectrophotometric methods for simultaneous determination of carbamazepine and lamotrigine in binary mixtures and urine samples. The Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences. 2014; Vol 18(3):491-506.
63. Swapnil A Ghorpade, Monali S. Sali, Vishnu P Choudhari et al. Simultaneous determination of emtricitabine and tenofovir by area under curve and dual wavelength spectrophotometric method. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 55, Nº 1, 2010:115-117.
64. Raval Kashyap, U. Srinivasa, Development and Validation of Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometric methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Ketotifen and Salbutamolin in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Sch. Acad. J. Pharm. 2015; 4(1): 16-23.
65. Vachhani Kevin H, Patel Satish A. Development and validation of spectrophotometric method for simultaneous estimation of metoprolol succinate and olmesartan medoxomilin tablet. IMSEAR.
66. M. B. Shankar, F. A. Mehta et al. Simultaneous Spectrophotometric Determination of Losartan Potassium and Hydrochlo- rothiazide in Tablets. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2003; 65(2): 167-170.
67. Hanan A. Merey. Simple spectrophotometric methods for the simultaneous determination of antipyrine and benzocaine. Bulletin of Faculty of Pharmacy, Cairo University. 2016; 54: 181-189.
68. Marianne Alphonse MAHROUSE and Ehab Farouk ELKADY. Validated Spectrophotometric Methods for the Simultaneous Determination of Ciprofloxacin Hydrochloride and Metronidazole in Tablets. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2011; 59(12): 1485-1493.
69. Hemesh Gadiya, Monika Maheshwari et al. Uv-Analytical Method Development and Validation for Simultaneous Estimation of Dapoxetine Hydrochloride and Sildenafil Citrate in Tablet Dosage Form. Asian J Pharm Clin Res. 2019; 12(1): 328-331.
70. Dharmendra K. Damor, Rajashree C. Mashru. Method development and validation of simultaneous estimaton of cilostazol and telmisartan. International Bulletin of Drug Research. 2015; 5(8): 12-22.
71. Amal M. Abou Al Alamein, Hanan A. Merey et al. Validated Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Determination of Sulphadoxine and trimethoprim in a Veterinary Pharmaceutical Dosage Form. Research J. Pharm. and Tech. 2020; 13(11): 5151-5157.
72. Swati sardana, Dr. R.C. Mashru. Simultaneous Determination of Phenylephrine Hydrochloride and Tropicamide in Ophthalmic Dosage Form with Three Rapid Derivative Spectrophotometric Methods. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2010; 4: 515-518.
73. Ekta S. Patel, Madhuri A. Hinge et al. Development and Validation of UV Spectrophotometric Methods for Simultaneous Estimation of Trimetazidine hydrochloride and Metoprolol succinate in Tablet Dosage Form. J Pharm Sci Bioscientific Res. 2016; 6(6): 773-784.
74. Khalid A.M. Attia, Ahmed H. Abdelazim et al. Comparative Study of Different Spectrophotometric Methods for Determination of Phenazopyridine Hydrochloride in the Presence of its Oxidative Degradation Product. TACL. 2016; 6(6): 863 – 873.
75. Ashok B. Patel. Ajay I. Patel, Shweta V. Gosai, Amikumar J. Vyas et al. UV spectrophotometric estimation of propranolol hydrochloride and rosuvastatin calcium in synthetic mixture using first order derivative method. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2020; Vol. 10: Issue 4, 189-194.
76. WANG Yu-bao, CHEN Yu-jing et al. Dual wavelength spectrophotometric determination of calcium in food.
77. Mir Ali Farajzadeh and Sepideh Nagizadeh. Citric Acid Determination by Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometry. Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society. 2002; 49: 619-624.
78. Lan GE, Jie LU et al. Measurement of Reducing Sugar in Black Liquor by Dual Wavelength Spectrophotometry. Advanced Materials Research Vols. 2013: 610-613, 254-258.
79. HX Shi, YY Hao et al. Separation and purification of amylose and amylopectin from cassava starch and content determination by dual-wavelength spectrophotometry. Food Science. 21; 2011.
80. Richard J. Norman, Jeffrey C. Edberg, and Joseph W. Sruciu. Determination of Nitrate in Soil Extracts by Dual-wavelength Ultraviolet Spectrophotometry. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1985; 49: 1182-1185.
81. Smith, D. R., and Nordberg, M. General Chemistry, Sampling, Analytical Methods, and Speciation. Handbook on the Toxicology of Metals- 4. 2015; 1: 15–44.
82. Hong-Wen Gao. Dual-wavelength spectrophotometric determinations of copper and its composition of the complex with eriochrome blue black R. Red. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas. 1995; 114:61-64.
83. Wei Fu-sheng, Tenc En-jiang et al. Dual-wavelength spectrophotometric determination of trace sulphide in domestic water through its ligand-exchange reaction with silver-cadion 2b-triton x- 100. Talanta. 1984; 31(11): 1024-1026.
84. Hong-Wen Gao. Dual-wavelength β-correction spectrophotometric determination of arsenic in wastewater with ethyl violet. Talanta. 1995; 42: 891-895.
85. A.H. Al-Bagawi, W. Ahmad, Z.M. Saigl et al. A simple and low-cost dual-wavelength β-correction spectrophotometric determination and speciation of mercury (II) in water using chromogenic reagent 4-(2-thiazolylazo) resorcinol. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy. 2017: 1-37.
86. Chan-huan Chung. Simultaneous determination of iron and titanium in silicate rocks by using diantipyrinylmethane with dual-wavelength spectrophotometry. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Analytzca Chlmzca Acta. 1983; 154:259-265.
87. Chen Ya-hong, Tian Feng-shou et al. Dual wavelength spectrophotometric determination of trace chromium (VI) in waste water.
88. Cheng Lifu, He Qiaohong, Zhu Youyu. Dual-wavelength spectrophotometric determination of trace amounts of germanium with salycyl fluorine. Physical Testing and Chemical Analysis Part B Chemical Analysis. 1996; 6.
89. P. Jones and G. Nickless. Spectrophotometric Determination of Methylmercury in Fish Tissue with Dithizone Using a Dual-wavelength Procedure. Analyst. November 1978; 103: 1121-1126.
90. X.-S. Chai, Q.X. Hou et al. Rapid determination of hydrogen peroxide in the wood pulp bleaching streams by a dual-wavelength spectroscopic method. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004; 507:281–284.
91. Shibata, S., Furukawa, M. et al. Dual-wavelength spectrophotometry: general method. Analytica Chimica Acta, Elsevier. 1969; 46(2): 271–279.
92. Nissan, R., Trope, M. et al. Dual wavelength spectrophotometry as a diagnostic test of the pulp chamber contents. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1992; 74(4): 508–514.
Received on 11.02.2022 Modified on 29.07.2023
Accepted on 19.04.2024 ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2024; 14(3):166-174.
DOI: 10.52711/2231-5675.2024.00030