A Review on Carcinogenic Impurities Found in Marketed Drugs and Strategies for its Determination by Analytical Methods

 

Amitkumar J. Vyas1, Jayshree P. Godhaniya1*, Ajay I. Patel1, Ashok B. Patel1, Nilesh K. Patel1,

Alpesh Chudasama2, Sunny R. Shah1

1Pharmaceutical Quality Assurance Department, B.K. Mody Government Pharmacy College,

Rajkot, Gujarat, India.

2Amneal Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd., 1 New England Avenue, Piscataway, NJ 07936, USA.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: jayshreegodhaniya1@gmail.com

 

ABSTRACT:

The control of potentially mutagenic and carcinogenic impurities in pharmaceutical products is key importance in evaluating carcinogenic risk to humans. The recent discovery of nitrosamine impurities in some marketed pharmaceuticals has increased the risk of their mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. According to the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), nitrosamine is the chemical classified as a probable human carcinogen. Nitrosamine impurities are known to be mutagenic and carcinogenic, very small exposure of these impurities can lead to cancer. These impurities may be produced and get incorporated into drug substances or drug products by a reagent, catalyst, solvent, or raw materials used in the process of manufacturing. The presence of nitrosamine impurities in angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) drugs containing tetrazole ring has caused worldwide product recalls. The various regulatory authorities have published the press release or notice regarding the control of these impurities with the interim limit. In 2007, the European medicines agency (EMA) suspended the marketing authorization of Viracept, because of the presence of elevated levels of ethyl methane sulfonate, in the drug product. Validated analytical methods are used to identify and quantify these impurities to the trace level at a given interim limit.

 

KEYWORDS: Carcinogenic, sartans, nitrosamine, tetrazole, angiotensin II receptor blocker, analytical methods

 

 


INTRODUCTION:

Impurities in pharmaceuticals are unwanted chemicals that can develop during synthesis, formulation preparation, or with the aging of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API). The presence of impurity even in small amounts may affect the efficacy and safety of pharmaceutical products. An impurity as defined by the ICH guidelines is “Any component of the medicinal product which is not the chemical entity defined as the active substance or an excipient in the product”.1

 

According to ICH Q3 impurity can be classified into three categories:

1.     Organic impurities can be formed during the manufacturing process and/or storage of the new drug substance. It includes starting materials, by-products, intermediates, degradation products, reagents, ligands, and catalysts.

2.     Inorganic impurities can produce from the manufacturing process. It can be reagents, ligands, and catalysts, heavy metals or other residual metals, inorganic salts, and other materials (e.g., filter aids, charcoal).

3.     Solvents are inorganic or organic liquids used as vehicles for the preparation of solutions or suspensions in the synthesis of a new drug substance. Some residue of the solvent remains in the final product and acts as an impurity.2,3,4

 

Some DNA reactive substances have the potential to directly cause DNA damage when present at low levels leading to mutations and therefore, potentially causing cancer. Carcinogens are chemicals or substance which causes cancer.5

 

The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) has devised a system of categories to evaluate the carcinogenicity of an agent in humans. An agent is classified based on scientific evidence derived from human and experimental animal studies and mechanistic and other relevant data. Categories are shown in the table.6

 

Table 1: IARC Classification of carcinogenic agents:

Groups

Description

Group 1

Carcinogenic to humans

Group 2A

Probably carcinogenic to humans*

Group 2B

Possibly carcinogenic to humans*

Group 3

Not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans

Group 4

Probably not carcinogenic to humans

 

Hazard assessment involves an initial analysis of actual and potential impurities by conducting database and literature searches for carcinogenicity and bacterial mutagenicity data to classify them as Class 1, 2, or 5 according to given in table no. 3.5

 

Table 2: Impurities Classification concerning Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Potential

Class

Definition

1

Known mutagenic carcinogens

2

Known mutagens with unknown carcinogenic potential (bacterial mutagenicity positive*, no rodent carcinogenicity data)

3

Alerting structure, unrelated to the structure of the drug substance; no mutagenicity data

4

Alerting structure, same alert in drug substance or compounds related to the drug substance (e.g., process intermediates) which have been tested and are nonmutagenic

5

No structural alerts, or alerting structure with sufficient data to demonstrate lack of mutagenicity or carcinogenicity

 

In past, many carcinogenic contaminants were found in the marketed drug, due to this contamination FDA recalled the contaminated drug. [7] In table no. 4 various carcinogenic contaminants and their contaminated drug are described.


 

Table 3: carcinogenic impurity found in pharmaceutical drug

Sr. No.

Name of impurity

Class of impurity

Impurity found in drug

Detection method

1.

NDMA (N-nitroso dimethylamine)

Nitrosamine

Ranitidine, Valsartan, metformin

GC-MS/MS, LC-MS, LC-HRMS, Rapid fire MS/MS, HPLC

2.

NDEA(N-nitrosodiethylamine)

Nitrosamine

Valsartan, irbesartan

GC-MS/MS, LC-HRMS, Rapid fire MS/MS

3.

NMBA (N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid)

Nitrosamine

Losartan potassium

LC-HRMS, Rapid fire MS/MS

4.

MNP (1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine)

Nitrosamine

Rifampin

LC-ESI-HRMS method

5.

CPNP (1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine)

Nitrosamine

Rifapentine

LC-ESI-HRMS method

6.

DMF (Dimethylformamide)

Solvent

Valsartan

GC-MS

7.

EMS (Ethyl methanesulfonate)

Sulfonate ester

Viracept

GC-MS

 


2. Carcinogenic Impurity:

2.1. NDMA (N-nitroso dimethylamine):

NDMA (N-nitroso dimethylamine) is a member of the “N-nitrosamine” class. According to IARC, it is classified in the class of GROUP 2A probably carcinogenic to humans.8 NDMA is a hepatotoxic and genotoxic substance.9

 

NDMA is defined as a chemical substance that belongs to the class of potent carcinogens and, as per the US Department of Health and Human Services; exposure to a high amount of NDMA may lead to liver damage. This is confirmed by animal studies that indicate that NDMA can create tumors in the kidney, liver, and respiratory tract, making it a likely human carcinogen.10

 

The generic chemical structure of NDMA is R2N–N=O, a deprotonated amine attaches to a nitroso group. N-nitrosamines are generally created when a secondary or tertiary amine reacts with a nitrosating agent.11

 

2.1.1. Structure of impurity and drug in which formed:

 

2.1.2 Source:

NDMA contamination may occur in some medications. There are two sources of NDMA contamination in medicine.

1.     The first source of contamination is the use of NDMA contaminated material during the manufacturing process of medication.

2.     The second source of NDMA contamination is NDMA produced from an intermediate or API (active pharmaceutical ingredient) itself. Ex, Ranitidine contains both nitrite and diethylamine group which create NDMA under stomach relevant pH.9

 

In the past two years, NDMA was found in some drugs like ranitidine, some sartan class drug-like valsartan, and metformin. Due to the presence of this impurity this all drug was removed from the market.10

 

2.1.3 Formation pathway of NDMA in ranitidine:

In September 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported routine testing had detected N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) impurity in ranitidine.12 The researchers documented that the formation of NDMA by nitrosation of ranitidine in stomach-relevant pH conditions in vitro and produced a mechanism of NDMA formation from ranitidine.13

 

Figure 2: Mechanism of NDMA formation from ranitidine.

 

Decomposition of ranitidine raise with raising NaNO2-to-ranitidine molar ratios. Previous research has documented that nitrosation of tertiary amines, such as the dimethylamino-carrying group in ranitidine, forms an unstable tertiary N-nitrosamine. This unstable intermediate can undergo dealkylation to form DMA, which is also undergoing nitrosation to form NDMA, a stable secondary N-nitrosamine.14

 

As the figure shows, NDMA is creating from the nitro and dimethylamino groups present in the drug structure, and Cl and H+ play main roles in the conversion of these groups into NDMA. The formation of nitrosyl chloride, which is a potent nitrosating agent, is also a critical step.15

 

 

Figure 3: Decomposition of ranitidine producing NDMA14

 

2.1.4 Formation of NDMA in sartans:

 In July 2018 FDA and EMA announced that carcinogenic impurity NDMA was found in some generic drugs especially in “sartan” class drugs.16

 

 

Figure 4: Sartan drugs with tetrazole ring

 

Sartan contains a tetrazole ring in their structure, during the synthesis of a tetrazole ring NDMA is created in presence of dimethylformamide (DMF) reagent. DMF is used as a solvent; it can decompose under certain conditions and create small amounts of dimethylamine (DMA). In acidic conditions, this amine then reacts with another chemical used in the manufacturing process called sodium nitrite (NaNO2), and in the acidic condition, it formed NDMA.17

 

Figure 5: Decomposition of DMF to form NDMA17

 

2.1.5 Formation of NDMA in valsartan:

Valsartan belongs to the class of angiotensin II receptor antagonists. It is used in the treatment of hypertension, congestive heart failure (CHF), and myocardial infarction.16,18

 

The presence of N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) in valsartan tablets may lead to a voluntary product recall of valsartan finished formulations in some industries. It was found that a change in the manufacturing process of valsartan API may lead to the formation of this impurity.19

 

According to figure no. 6 synthesis of valsartan starts from (S)-valin methyl ester and 4-(bromomethyl)-[1,1_-biphenyl]-2-carbonitrile or 2-cyano-4-formylbiphenyl. As final step of the synthesis is the formation of the tetrazole moiety by reaction with azidotributyltin (IV).20

 

ZHP (Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceuticals) made a change in their manufacturing process to reduce waste and improve yield. ZHP changed the synthetic process of tetrazole ring formation in the valsartan. Tributylin azide was replaced with a more toxic compound sodium azide, and dimethyl formamide was used as solvent. Sodium nitrite was then used to quench excess sodium azide in synthesis. In the acidic environment, sodium nitrite creates nitrous acid, which could react with dimethylamine present in dimethylformamide (the solvent used in tetrazole forming reaction) to produce NDMA.20

 

Figure 6: Synthesis pathway of valsartan according to European pharmacopeia.20

 

Figure 7: Tetrazole ring formation with sodium azide.21

 

2.1.6 Metabolism of NDMA:

NDMA requires metabolic activation to produce their carcinogenic and mutagenic effect.22 NDMA is primarily metabolized by CYP2E1 in the liver of rodents and then leading to the formation of a methyl diazonium ion. After that this methyl diazonium ion reacts with DNA and predominantly creates N7 and O6 -methyl guanine (N7MG and O6 MG), the latter being highly mutagenic.18

 

Figure 8: Metabolic activation of NDMA to form DNA reactive methyl diazonium ion.

 

NDMA is metabolized by CYP2E1 and formed methyl diazonium ion by α-hydroxylation pathway.23,24 Toxicological effect of NDMA depends on metabolic activation by CYP2E1 and DNA-repair capacities for the specific DNA-repair adducts form.18

 

The primary DNA adducts formed following exposure to NDMA is N7 -methylguanine and O6 -methylguanine is a secondary adduct. Other DNA adducts created in smaller amounts include N3 -methyladenine, and O4 -methylthaymine.

 

The formation and persistence of the secondary adduct, O6 -methylguanine, being associated with both the carcinogenicity and mutagenicity of NDMA.24

 

2.2.1 NDEA (N-nitrosodiethylamine):

NDEA (N-nitrosodiethylamine) belongs to the “N-nitrosamine” class.10 As per IARC, this impurity is classified under class group 2A, probably carcinogenic to humans.8

 

2.2.2 Structure:

 

Figure 9: Structure of NDEA

 

FDA and EMA in July 2018, announced that carcinogenic impurity NDMA is found in some generic sartan class drugs include valsartan. In November 2018 irbesartan is recalled from the market due to NDEA impurity found.16

 

2.2.3 Formation of NDEA in valsartan:

Valsartan belongs to sartan class this class compound contains tetrazole ring in their structure. During tetrazole ring formation NDEA is formed as a byproduct. NDEA may be generated from DEA (diethylamine) as same as NDMA formed from DMA.18

 

Figure 10: Formation of NDEA from diethylamine.

 

DEA could be formed from the degradation of triethylamine (TEA) or present as an impurity in the raw material of TEA.18

 

Figure 11: Formation of NDEA from TEA by nitrosation.

 

Direct nitrosation of TEA may cause by nitrosonium ion, resulting in the formation of an aldehyde and a secondary amine, which further react with nitrous acid to form a nitrosamine.18

 

2.2.4 Metabolism of NDEA:

NDEA requires metabolic activation to give their carcinogenic effect. Metabolism of NDEA is similar to NDMA with the primary activation step by α-hydroxylation to α-hydroxyl-NDEA and finally creating an ethyldiazonium ion reacting with DNA and formation of O4 -ethyldeoxythymidine (O4 ET) and O6 -ethylguanin (O6 EG) which are primary mutagenic adducts.18 This DNA adducts formation depends on the individual negative charge present in each DNA base.25

NDEA is metabolized in humans primarily by enzyme CYP2E1 and CYP2A6. NDEA causes a raise in mutation in the different organ of mouse and cause cancer in different species and different organ of a laboratory animal in which the liver is being the primary target organ.18

 

The toxicological effect of NDEA depends on metabolic activation by CYP2E1 and/or CYP2A6 and DNA-repair capacities for the specific DNA-adducts formed. NDEA is biotransformed to create an ethyl diazonium ion by cytochrome p450 enzymes (mainly CYP2E1). Ethyl diazonium ion can further react with nucleophilic sites of DNA and form adducts which can induce cancer.19

 

Figure 12: Biotransformation of NDEA and mechanism of DNA-adduct formation.

 

2.3.1 NMBA (N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid):

NMBA belongs to the class of N-nitrosamine. The impurity is a known animal and potential human carcinogen. N-Nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA) is a tobacco-specific nitrosamine carcinogen. It is oxidized to the reactive metabolite methyl-2-oxopropylnitrosamine (MOPN) in isolated rat liver mitochondria. NMBA produces bladder transitional cell carcinomas in rats when administered in the drinking water.26

 

2.3.2 Structure of NMBA:

 

Figure 13: Structure of NMBA

2.3.3 Formation of NMBA:

NMBA could be formed during the synthesis of losartan while using sodium nitrite and N-methyl pyrrolidone.18

 

Figure 14: Formation of NMBA

Formation of NMBA is attributed to the generation of 4-(Methylamino) butyric acid due to the hydrolysis of NMP and excess of NaNO2 and HCl, used for quenching the excess Sodium azide / HN3.27

 

Limits of nitrosamine impurity:

In European Union, EMA gave temporary interim limits for nitrosamine impurity in sartan.28,29

 

Table 4: EMA published limits for nitrosamine in sartans.

Drug

MD (mg/day)

 Acceptable intake

 NDMA (ng/day)

NDMA (ppm)

NDEA (ng/day)

NDEA (ppm)

NMBA (ng/day)

NMBA (ppm)

Valsartan

320

96.0

0.300

26.5

0.082

96.0

0.300

Losartan

150

96.0

0.640

26.5

0.177

96.0

0.640

Olmesartan

40

96.0

2.400

26.5

0.663

96.0

2.400

Irbesartan

300

96.0

0.320

26.5

0.088

96.0

0.320

Candesartan

32

96.0

3.000

26.5

0.820

96.0

3.000

 

In the United States, interim limits for nitrosamine impurity in sartan are developed and published by the FDA.28,30

 

Table 5: FDA published an interim limit for nitrosamine in sartans.

Drug

MD (mg/day)

Acceptable intake

NDMA (ng/day)

NDMA (ppm)

NDEA (ng/day)

NDEA (ppm)

NMBA (ng/day)

NMBA (ppm)

Valsartan

320

96

0.3

26.5

0.083

96

0.3

Losartan

100

96

0.96

26.5

0.27

96

0.96

Irbesartan

300

96

0.32

26.5

0.088

96

0.32

Azilsartan

80

96

1.2

26.5

0.33

96

1.2

Olmesartan

40

96

2.4

26.5

0.66

96

2.4

Eprosartan

800

96

0.12

26.5

0.033

96

0.12

Candesartan

32

96

3.0

26.5

0.83

96

3.0

telmisartan

80

96

1.2

26.5

0.33

96

1.2

MD*= maximum daily dose

 


2.4.1 MNP (1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine):

MNP (1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine) belongs to the nitrosa mine class of compounds, some of which are classified as probable or possible human carcinogens (substances that could cause cancer), based on laboratory tests such as rodent carcinogenicity studies. Although there are no data available to directly evaluate the carcinogenic potential of MNP, information available on closely related nitrosamine compounds was used to calculate lifetime exposure limits for MNP.31

 

2.4.2 Structure of MNP and drug in which formed:

 

Figure 15: Structure of MNP and drug in which formed.

2.4.3 Impurity in rifampin:

FDA recently became aware of nitrosamine impurities found in certain samples of rifampin which was MNP (1-methyl-4-nitrosopiperazine).32 To avoid a potential shortage of this drug, the FDA is allowing manufacturers to temporarily distribute products with impurities above the acceptable intake limits while an investigation into the source continues. FDA and manufacturers are investigating the cause of this impurity in rifampin.33

 

2.4.4 Limits:

As per the FDA, the acceptable intake limits are 0.16 parts per million (ppm) for MNP in rifampin. The agency will not object to certain manufacturers temporarily distributing rifampin containing MNP below 5 parts per million (ppm).31

 

2.5.1 CPNP (1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine):

CPNP belongs to the nitrosamine class of compounds, some of that are classified as probable or possible human carcinogens (substances that could cause cancer), based on laboratory data such as rodent carcinogenicity studies. Currently, there is no evidence available to check the carcinogenic potential of MNP and CPNP.31

 

2.5.2 Structure of CPNP and drug in which it formed:

 

Figure 16: Structure of CPNP and drug in which formed

 

2.5.3 CPNP in rifapentine:

FDA recently became aware of nitrosamine impurities found in certain samples of rifapentine which was CPNP (1-cyclopentyl-4-nitrosopiperazine).32 To avoid a potential shortage of this drug, the FDA is allowing manufacturers to temporarily distribute products with impurities above the acceptable intake limits while an investigation into the source continues. FDA and manufacturers are investigating the source of this impurity in rifapentine.33

 

2.5.4 Limits:

The acceptable intake limit is 0.1 ppm for CPNP in rifapentine. The agency also will not object to certain manufacturers temporarily distributing rifapentine containing CPNP below 14 ppm.31

 

2.6.1 DMF (dimethylformamide):

Dimethylformamide is belongs to the class of formamides that is formamide in which the amino hydrogens are replaced by methyl groups. It has a role as a polar aprotic solvent and a hepatotoxic agent. It is a volatile organic compound and belongs to the formamide class. It derives from a formamide.34 DMF is a chemical that was reclassified in 2018 as a Group 2A probable human carcinogen by the World Health Organization (“WHO”) and (“IARC”).35

 

2.6.2 Structure:

 

Figure 17: Structure of DMF

 

FDA has been informed that a solvent called dimethylformamide (DMF) was discovered in valsartan made by several companies, including Novartis. DMF is classified by the World Health Organization as a probable carcinogen.36 If DMF were present in valsartan that also contained NDMA, which could exacerbate the cancer risks, according to Valisure. Its tests detected DMF in valsartan alone and in pills where it was combined with a blood-pressure drug called hydrochlorothiazide.37

 

2.6.3 Metabolism of DMF:

 

Figure 18: Biotransformation of DMF

 

The major metabolic pathway for DMF in mammalian species is oxidation by the cytochrome P-450- dependent mixed-function oxidase system to HMMF. This can generate NMF and formaldehyde. Further cytochrome P450-mediated oxidation of NMF and/or HMMF results in the formation of S-(N-methyl carbamoyl) glutathione (SMG), the conjugate of the presumed reactive (toxic) intermediate, methyl isocyanate, excreted in vivo as N-acetyl-S-(N-methyl carbamoyl) cysteine (AMCC).37 The proposed mechanism of the key step in the metabolic activation of N, N-dimethylformamide through the oxidation of N-methyl formamide is shown in Figure 19. Methyl isocyanate was also reported to be the main product of N-methyl formamide photo-oxidation with hydroxyl radicals under aerobic conditions and the carbonyl centered radical was proposed as a precursor to methyl isocyanate based on quantum chemical calculations.37,38

 

 

Figure 19: Proposed mechanism of generation of the key electrophilic carbamoylating species, methyl isocyanate

 

2.7 Ethyl methanesulfonate:

Ethyl methanesulfonate is alkyl sulfonic acid salt, it is also known as ethyl mesylate.39 According to IARC EMS is classified as group 2B possibly carcinogenic to humans.8 Ethyl methanesulfonate is a methanesulfonate ester resulting from the formal condensation of methanesulfonic acid with ethanol. It has a role as an alkylating agent, an antineoplastic agent, a carcinogenic agent, a genotoxin, a mutagen, and a teratogenic agent.40

 

2.7.1 Structure of EMS and drug in which formed:

 

Figure 20: Structure of EMS and Viracept

 

2.7.2 EMS in Viracept:

On 5 June 2007, the marketing authorization holder (MAH) informed the European medicines agency (EMA) that Viracept was being recalled from European Union markets with immediate effect since contamination of the product with a genotoxic substance (ethyl methanesulfonate; ethyl mesylate; EMS) had been detected.41

 

2.7.3 Formation:

 

Figure 21: Formation of alkyl sulfonates from sulfonic acid and short-chain aliphatic alcohol.

 

The root cause of the contamination was a GMP failure in respect of the holding tank for MSA, which is used in the final step of the synthesis to convert the nelfinavir base to its mesylate salt. Following non-routine maintenance, the holding tank was cleaned according to the standard operating procedure (i.e. with ethanol), but, crucially, no tank drying was performed. On refilling of the tank with neat MSA, a reaction with the residual ethanol ensued, leading over time (several months) to the production of significant concentrations of EMS. This contaminated MSA was used for the October 2006 campaigns for the manufacture of nelfinavir mesylate API and subsequent drug product batches.40

 

2.7.4 Carcinogenic mechanism:

Ethyl Methanesulfonate is a sulfonoxyalkane with carcinogenic and teratogenic properties. Ethyl methanesulfonate ethylates DNA, thereby damaging DNA and leading to genetic mutations, single-stranded breaks in DNA, and chromosomal aberrations. Ethyl methanesulfonate may be used experimentally in biomedical research.39

 

3. Analytical Method for Detection of Impurities:

Analytical methods are considered to be a backbone of the pharmaceutical industry and research development laboratories to produce quality products needed for human welfare. Depending on the method of working, chemical analysis can be categorized into two terms as qualitative and quantitative. Qualitative deals with the identification, and quantitative deals with the quantification of desired bioactive/impurity components, respectively. Various analytical methods including FT-IR, UV, HPLC, LC-MS/MS, GC-MS/MS with Headspace, NMR, LC-HRMS, LC-NMR, CE-MS, CE-NMR, SFC-MS, and LC-FT-IR are regularly used nowadays for qualitative and quantitative estimation of pharmaceuticals.42 Analytical method validation is required to develop new process, new molecules, active ingredients, residues, impurity profiling and component of interest in different matrices.43

 

3.1 GC-MS/MS:                                                                                                      

Gas chromatography along with mass spectrometry (GC-MS) is the most frequently employed method for the determination of Nitrosamines with lower molecular weight. The majority of recent publications employed GC-MS, GC–HS/MS or GC-MS-MS methods due to its high selectivity and low detection limit.16

 

GC-MS is a destructive and hard ionization method for a qualitative and quantitative calculation for volatile organic compound or APIs, Although GC with various detectors can be used for nitrosamine detection, however, nitrogen-phosphorous detector (NPD) and nitrogen chemiluminescence detector (NCD) are the most convenient for the same. In general, NDMA studies are performed in GC-MS using d6-NDMA as the internal standard.44 Gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry is particularly useful in the determination of organic volatile impurities. In this method the carrier gases are such as hydrogen, helium, nitrogen and argon used as mobile phase for the chromatographic separation.45,46

 

FDA developed the combined OTR GC/MS headspace method was for the simultaneous assessment of four nitrosamine impurities in ARB drug substance and drug product.

 

3.2 Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC/MS, LC/MS/MS):

LC method offers a faster alternative to the traditional GC-MS methods. The use of high-resolution accurate mass spectrometry helps to obtain good selectivity for the detection of both GC detectable and GC-undetectable compounds along with thermally stable and unstable Nitrosamines.42,47

 

LC-MS is a hyphenated method, which separates and quantifies the components from a complex mixture with the help of mass spectrometer. Mass spectrometer separates and estimates the charged components. LC-MS is a well-known method to analyze large, polar, ionic, nonvolatile, and unstable organic compounds. LC-MS/MS analysis is being done via soft ionization and impurity analysis using various types of modern ionization sources including electrospray ionization (ESI), matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI), APPI, APCI, CI, EI, FAB, SIM5, Z Spray, and TSP. ESI and APCI are widely used for the analysis of nitrosamine impurities present in various samples such as food materials, drinking water, and pharmaceuticals samples.42,48

 

3.3 Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-HRMS):

 In October 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noted that a third-party lab used higher temperatures in its tests to check for nitrosamine impurities. NDMA was formed by the heat application, but higher temperatures were recommended for the use of a gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) technique to test NDMA on valsartan and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). The FDA has declared that it recommends the use of a mass spectrometry high-performance liquid chromatography (LC-HRMS Chromatography-High Resolution -Liquid Mass Spectrometry) test protocol to test ranitidine samples. Its LC-HRMS test method doesn't use highs temperatures and showed much lower levels of NDMA in ranitidine drugs than those reported by the third-party laboratory.49

 A LC-HRMS method was developed and validated following ICH Q2 (R1) for the detection and quantitation of six nitrosamine impurities in losartan drug substance and drug product, including N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), N-nitroso-ethyl isopropylamine (NEIPA), N-nitrosodiisopropylamine (NDIPA), N-nitrosodibutylamine (NDBA) and N-nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA).

 

3.4 LC-ESI-HRMS:

In May 2020, FDA received a report from an applicant holder that a single lot of rifapentine drug substance contained 1-Cyclopentyl-4- Nitrosopiperazine (CPNP). OTR had been assigned to develop and validate a method and test for MNP in rifampin and CPNP in rifapentine drug product and drug substance to determine the level of these two nitrosopiperazine impurities. MNP and CPNP belong to the nitrosamine class of compounds, some of which are classified as probable or possible human carcinogens.

 

A combined LC-ESI-HRMS method was developed and validated according to ICH Q2 (R1) for the estimation and quantitation of MNP in rifampin and CPNP in rifapentine drug substance and drug product.50

 

3.5 HPLC:

Liquid chromatography is a very important separation method that has a significant impact in the area of pharmaceuticals and chemistry. The last decade is the witness where HPLC has played an important role to purify components from the biological complex mixtures. Chromatography is based on the partitioning (relative solubilities in both phases) of solutes between two phases. Various HPLC methods have been reported for nitrosamine impurities. HPLC is a modern analytical technique, and the same is being widely used for formulation, and quality control of nitrosamine impurity estimation in routine daily practice. The HPLC is the most simple, economic, reliable and worldwide used technique in the pharmaceutical analysis.42,51,52,53

 

3.6 Rapid-fire MS/MS:

Nitrosamine impurities are believed to have been introduced into the finished products through several pathways that include synthesis and manufacturing routes. OTR has developed an advanced analytics robotics-tandem mass spectrometry method (RapidFireMS/MS) to screen and quantitate the presence of NDMA/NDEA/NMBA nitrosamine impurities in losartan potassium API. The method can be adapted to quantitate these nitrosamine impurities in other “sartan” drug API and products.

 

A novel RapidFire-MS/MS method has been developed to simultaneously quantify NDMA, NDEA, and NMBA in losartan potassium API.54

 

4. CONCLUSION:

In pharmaceutical industry many drugs are contaminated with carcinogenic impurity. Because of their carcinogenic effect these drugs are recalled from market for safety of consumer. In past two-year nitrosamine class impurity are found in many drugs and which are recalled from market. NDMA, NDEA and NMBA is belongs to nitrosamine class which are probable carcinogenic to human. It is formed in sartan class drugs which contains tetrazole ring in their structure. NDMA and NDEA are metabolized by α-hydroxylation pathway and create DNA-adducts. NMBA could be formed during the synthesis of losartan while using sodium nitrite and N-methyl pyrrolidone. MNP and CPNP are nitrosamine impurities formed in rifampin and rifapentine which are antituberculosis drugs. FDA has been informed that a solvent called dimethylformamide (DMF) was discovered in valsartan made by several companies. DMF has classified by WHO as probable human carcinogen. The major metabolic pathway for DMF in mammalian species is oxidation by the cytochrome P-450- dependent mixed-function oxidase system to HMMF. Ethyl methanesulfonate is alkyl sulfonic acid salt which are possible human carcinogen found in viracept drug produce due to GMP failure. Various analytical method are used for analyze and quantify these carcinogenic impurity.

 

5. REFERENCES:

1.      Landge AK, Deshmukh VK and Chaudhar SR. Impurities in Pharmaceuticals- A Review. Journal of Current Pharma Research. 2013; 4(1): 1105-1116.

2.       ICH – Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, “Impurity in new drug substance Q3(A)”, International Conference on Harmonization, IFPMA, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

3.      Poonam R. Songire, Smita Aher, Prof. Dipti Phadtare, Saudagar R. B. Review on Guideline on Elemental Impurities. Asian J. Research Chem. 2016; 9(5): 226-232. doi: 10.5958/0974- 4150.2016.00039.0

4.      Shefali Patel, Madhavi Apte. A Review on Signicances of Impurity Proling a Review on Signicances of Impurity Proling. Res. J. Pharm. Dosage Form. and Tech. Jan.-Mar. 2016; 8(1): 31-36. doi: 10.5958/0975-4377.2016.00005.7

5.      ICH – Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, “Assessment and control of DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities in pharmaceuticals to limit potential carcinogenic risk M7”, International Conference on Harmonization, IFPMA, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.

6.      International Agency for Research on Cancer, November 2020: https://wiki.cancer.org.au/policy/IARC_classifications

7.      Thresher A. Are all nitrosamines concerning? A review of mutagenicity and carcinogenicity data. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.yrtph.2020.104749.

8.      IARC classification, November 2020: http://monographs.iarc.fr/ ENG/Classification/index.php

9.      Andrea V. Eads. Pharmacists are key in interpreting clinical implications of N-nitrosodimethylamine contamination in medications. Journal of the American Pharmacists Association. 2020; 1-5.

10.   Georgi T, Ivanka T. Drug-Induced Melanoma: Irbesartan Induced Cutaneous Melanoma! First Description in the World Literature! Open Access Maced J Med Sc. 2019; 7(1): 114-116.

11.   NDMA, a contaminant found in multiple drugs, has industry seeking sources and solutions, November 2020: https://cen.acs.org/ pharmaceuticals/pharmaceutical-chemicals/NDMA-contaminant-found-multiple-drugs/98/i15

12.   FDA Requests Removal of All Ranitidine Products (Zantac) from the Market November 2020: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/ press-announcements/fda-requests-removal-all-ranitidine-products-zantac-market.

13.   Jennifer A, Wagner and Jennifer M. Commentary medicine and Media: The Ranitidine Debate. Clinical and Translational Science. 2020; doi:10.1111/cts.12753

14.   Teng Z, William A. Oral intake of ranitidine increases urinary excretion of N-nitrosodimethylamine. Carcinogenesis. 2016; 37: 625-634. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgw034

15.   NDMA in drugs, Ranitidine, November 2020: https://cen.acs.org/ pharmaceuticals/Reactions/98/i21

16.   Dr. Shaikh T, Dr. Gosar A and Dr. Sayyed H. Nitrosamine Impurities in Drug Substances and Drug Products. Journal of Advances in Pharmacy Practices. 2020; 2: 48-57.

17.   EMA overview: Lessons learnt from presence of N-nitrosamine impurities in sartan medicines.

18.   EMA Assessment report: angiotensin-II-receptor antagonists (sartans) containing a tetrazole group, Referral under Article 31 of Directive 2001/83/EC.

19.   Charoo NA et al. Lesson Learnt from Recall of Valsartan and Other Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker Drugs Containing NDMA and NDEA Impurities. American Association of Pharmaceutical Scientists. 2019; 20: 166. DOI: 10.1208/s12249-019-1376-1

20.   Parr MK, Joseph JF. NDMA impurity in valsartan and other pharmaceutical products: Analytical methods for the determination of N-nitrosamines. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis.2019; 164: 536-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jpba.2018.11.010

21.   What would cause NDMA contamination in valsartan? November 2020: https://www.quora.com/What-would-cause-NDMA-contamination-in-valsartan

22.   NDMA, November 2020: https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ compound/n-nitrosodimethylamine

23.   Sulc M, Hodek P, Stiborová F. The binding affinity of carcinogenic N-nitrosodimethylamine and N-nitrosomethylaniline to cytochromes P450 2B4, 2E1 and 3A6 does not dictate the rate of their enzymatic N-demethylation. Gen. Physiol. Biophys. 2010; 29: 175-85.

24.   N-Nitrosodimethylamine in Drinking-water Background document for development of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality

25.   Bartsch H, Neill TKO and Schulte-Hermann R. Relevance of n-nitroso compounds to human cancer: exposures and mechanisms. IARC, 1986.

26.   NMBA November 2020: https://www.caymanchem.com/product/ 30911/n-nitroso-n-methyl-4-aminobutyric-acid

27.   Darker side of technology- A game changer. IDMA, 2019.

28.   European Medicines Agency. Temporary interim limits for NMBA, DIPNA and EIPNA impurities in sartan blood pressure medicines. November 2020.

29.   U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Updates and press announcements on angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) recalls (Valsartan, Losartan, and Irbesartan), November 2020. https:// www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-updates-and-press-announcementsangiotensin-ii-receptor-blocker-arb-recalls-valsartan-losartan

30.   Taniguchi J et al. Nitrosamines in Pharmaceuticals: Toxicity, Risk Analysis, Chemistry, and Test Methods.American pharmaceuticals review. 2020. Avalible from URL: https:// www.americanpharmaceuticalreview.com/Featured-Articles/ 561484-Nitrosamines-in-Pharmaceuticals-Toxicity-Risk-Analysis-Chemistry-and-Test-Methods/

31.   FDA works to mitigate shortages of rifampin and rifapentine after manufacturers find nitrosamine impurities, November 2020: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-works-mitigate-shortages-rifampin-and-rifapentine-after-manufacturers-find-nitrosamine

32.   FDA addresses nitrosamines in TB drugs, November 2020: https:// www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/8/fda-addresses-nitrosamines-in-tb-drugs

33.   US FDA allows supply of 2 tuberculosis drugs with impurities to avoid shortages, November 2020: https://www.spglobal.com/ marketintelligence/en/news-insights/latest-news-headlines/us-fda-allows-supply-of-2-tuberculosis-drugs-with-impurities-to-avoid-shortages-60114091

34.   N,N-Dimethylformamide, November 2020: https:// pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/N_N-Dimethylformamide

35.   Valisure Detects High Levels of DMF in Valsartan, November 2020: https://www.valisure.com/blog/valisure-news/valisure-detects-high-levels-of-dmf-in-valsartan/

36.   More trouble for valsartan with discovery of Fourth carcinogen, November 2020: https://www.pharmacist.com/article/more-trouble -valsartan-discovery-fourth-carcinogen#:~:text=FDA%20has%20 been%20informed%20that,Organization%20as%20a%20probable%20carcinogen

37.   N,N-DIMETHYLFORMAMIDE, Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 31,WHO.

38.   N,N- Dimethylformamide IARC monograph.1989,1999.

39.   Ethyl methanesulfonate, November 2020: https:// pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Ethyl-methanesulfonate

40.   David PE, David JS. Drug substances presented as sulfonic acid salts: overview of utility, safety and regulation. Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology. 2009; 61: 269–278.

41.   Muller L et al. Ethyl methanesulfonate toxicity in Viracept-A comprehensive human risk assessment based on threshold data for genotoxicity. Toxicology Letters, 2009: 317–329. Doi:10.1016/ j.toxlet.2009.04.003.

42.   Shaik KM et al. Regulatory Updates and Analytical Methodologies for Nitrosamine Impurities Detection in Sartans, Ranitidine, Nizatidine, and Metformin along with Sample Preparation Techniques Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 2020.

43.   Sahoo CK et al. Validation of Analytical Procedures- A Review. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2018; 8(2): 109-116. doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2018.00021.2

44.   Lima H, Yun-Suk Ohb and Shin H. Determination of N-nitrosodimethylamine and N-nitrosomethylethylamine in drug substances and products of sartans, metformin and ranitidine by precipitation and solid phase extraction and gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Analysis, 2020.

45.   Khan H and Ali J. Identication of Impurities and Degradation Productsin Pharmaceutical Products- Role of Hyphenated Techniques. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2017; 7(1): 31-35. doi: 10.5958/ 2231-5675.2017.00006.0

46.   Dubey RD. Mass Spectroscopy: A Versatile Analytical Technique. Research J. Science and Tech. 2011; 3(2): 55-64.

47.   Dwivedi A et al. Impurity Proling With Use of Hyphenated Techniques. Asian J. Research Chem. 2012; 5(7): 875-881.

48.   Pramod K et al. An Overview: LC-MS as Tool of sample Extraction and Quantication in Bioanalytical Laboratories. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2020; 10(3): 165-172. doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2020.00030.7

49.   Naseeh PK and Ranjan A. A review article on prevalence of colorectal cancer with ranitidine. International Journal of Modern Pharmaceutical Research. 2020; 7-13.

50.   USFDA: Liquid Chromatography-High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (LC-ESI-HRMS) Method for the Determination of MNP in Rifampin and CPNP in Rifapentine Drug Substance and Drug Product, 2019.

51.   Khan H, Javed A. UHPLC: Applicationsin Pharmaceutical Analysis. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2017; 7(2): 124-131. doi: 10.5958/ 2231-5675.2017.00020.5

52.   Ramraje GR. A Brief Review on: Separation Techniques Chromatography. Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2020; 10(4): 231-238. doi: 10.5958/2231-5675.2020.00041.1

53.   Khan H. Analytical Method Development in Pharmaceutical Research: Stepsinvolved in HPLC Method Development. Asian J. Pharm. Res. 2017; 7(3): 203-207. doi: 10.5958/2231-5691.2017.00031.4

54.   USFDA: Development and validation of a RapidFire-MS/MS method for screening of nitrosamine carcinogen impurities N-Nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), N-Nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), N-Nitrosoethylisopropylamine (NEIPA), N-Nitrosodiisopropylamine (NDIPA), NNitrosodibutylamine (NDBA) and N-Nitroso-N-methyl-4-aminobutyric acid (NMBA) in API.

 

 

 

Received on 30.12.2020        Revised on 10.02.2021                                                                                                           

Accepted on 12.03.2021     ©Asian Pharma Press All Right Reserved

Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis. 2021; 11(2):159-169.

DOI: 10.52711/2231-5675.2021.00028