Development
and Validation of Bioanalytical Method for the Determination
of Cobicistat from Human Plasma
S Madhavi*,
A Prameela Rani
University College of Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna Nagar,
Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India. - 522
510
*Corresponding Author E-mail: madhavitirumalesh@gmail.com
ABSTRACT:
A simple
and sensitive bio-analytical RP-HPLC method with PDA detection was developed and
validated for the quantification of cobicistat in human
plasma. Febuxostat was used as an internal standard. The
analytes were extracted from human plasma samples by liquid-liquid
extraction technique. Chromatographic separation was accomplished with a Column
Inertsil- BDS 250(I.D-4.6mm, particle size-5µm), Mobile
phase composition 0.1% OPA Buffer: Acetonitrile (45:55),
Flow rate: 1 ml/min, Injection volume 50 µl, Run time 10 min, Detection wavelength
210nm, PDA detector, Column temperature 30şC. The retention time of cobicistat and internal standard was found to be 4.0min and
5.4min respectively. The calibration curve obtained was linear (r2= 0.9992) over
the concentration range of 0.01-10.0 µg/ml. The proposed method was validated by
performing linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, specificity, ruggedness (precision
and accuracy), stability studies, reinjection reproducibility. The results were
found to be within limits. The method was validated as per the USFDA guidelines.
Hence the validated method is suitable for conducting pharmacokinetic studies and
therapeutic drug monitoring.
KEYWORDS:
Bio-analytical,
RP-HPLC, Cobicistat,
Febuxostat,
plasma.
INTRODUCTION:
Cobicistat1-5 is a chemically known as (1,3-thiazol-5-yl)methyl N-[(2R,5R)-5-[(2S)-2-{[methyl({[2-(propan-2-yl)-1,3-thiazol-4-yl]methyl})carbamoyl]amino}-4-(morpholin-4-yl)butanamido]-1,6-diphenylhexan-2-yl]
Cobicistat, trade name Tybost
(formerly GS-9350), is a licensed drug for use in the treatment of infection with
human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Although it does not have any anti-HIV activity,
Cobicistat acts as a pharmacokinetic enhancer by inhibiting
cytochrome P450 3A isoforms
(CYP3A) and therefore increases the systemic exposure of co administered agents
that are metabolized by CYP3A enzymes.
More specifically, Cobicistat is indicated to increase systemic exposure of atazanavir or darunavir (once daily
dosing regimen) in combination with other antiretroviral agents in the treatment
of HIV-1 infection. Increasing systemic exposure of anti-retrovirals
(ARVs) without increasing dosage allows for better treatment outcomes and a decreased
side effect profile.
Following oral administration
of Cobicistat with food in HIV-1 infected subjects, peak
plasma concentrations were observed 4 hours post-dose for Cobicistat.
The steady-state mean Cmax, AUCtau,
and Ctrough (mean ± SD) following multiple doses of Cobicistat in HIV-1 infected subjects (n = 68), respectively,
were 1.2 ± 0.3 μg/ml, 10.9 ± 3.8 μg/ml, and 0.07 ± 0.07 μg/ml.
Cobicistat is 97-98% bound to human plasma proteins and
the mean plasma to blood drug Cobicistat is metabolized
via CYP3A (major)- and CYP2D6 (minor)-mediated oxidation and does not undergo glucuronidation. Following oral administration of [14C] Cobicistat, 99% of circulating radioactivity in plasma was unchanged
cobicistat. Low levels of metabolites are observed in
urine and faeces and do not contribute to the CYP3A inhibitory
activity of cobicistat. Following oral administration
of [14C] Cobicistat, 86% and 8.2% of the dose were recovered
in faeces and urine, respectively. The median terminal
plasma half-life of Cobicistat following administration
of Tybost is approximately
3-4 hours.
Based on the literature
available, Cobicistat is quantitative determined by high
performance liquid chromatography (RP–HPLC), gas chromatography (GC) with mass spectrometric
(MS) detection 11 and radioimmunoassay (RIA). The usual HPLC methods
have the limitation in sensitivity and selectivity and GC methods are requires more
time for the sample preparation and longer run time for analysis. A RIA method requires
handling of radioactive materials, prolonged incubation and is more prone to cross
reactivity. Hence there is a necessity to develop sensitive, selective and rapid
analytical methods such as LC-MS/MS.
Two liquid chromatography
(LC) mass spectrometry (MS) methods have been reported for the determination of
Cobicistat with other steroids in serum and water effluents. But there were no reports
available for the determination of Cobicistat alone in
human plasma. Many formulations available for Cobicistat
alone in the market and should have a proper analytical method to quantify the drug
concentrations in plasma. Hence I made an attempt to develop and validate a simple
HPLC method for the estimation of Cobicistat in human
plasma with better sensitivity and short runtime.
In the present work the author has been developed and fully
validated a HPLC method for quantifying Cobicistat in
human plasma. The sample preparation is simple and rapid with no derivatization process. This is the first validated assay to
determine Cobicistat alone in human plasma.
Fig. 1: Cobicistat structure
Fig. 2: Febuxostat (IS) structure
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
Instrumentation:
Chromatographic separation was
performed on WATERS HPLC model: 2695, separation module, photodiode array detector
model 2996, automatic injection, sampling vial 120. The instrument was operated
using computer via Empower-2 software. The
mobile phase was filtered through a 0.45µm membrane filter and degassed for 30 min.
Analysis was performed at 300c temperature.
Preparation of stock and intermediate working solutions
of Cobicistat:
Stock solution of Cobicistat
was prepared in HPLC grade methanol at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The prepared stock concentrations were corrected based on
its potency and actual amount weighed. Two separate stock solutions were prepared
for the preparation of calibration standards (CC) and quality control samples (QC).
The working solutions required for plotting calibration curve were also prepared
in methanol. Likewise, quality controls (QCs) for the determination of precision
and accuracy were prepared by appropriate dilution of the second stock solution
prepared above using the same diluents. The QC samples were prepared in five different
concentration levels covering the entire CC range.
Preparation of stock solution and working solution of IS:
Take 10 mg of Febuxostat in 10
ml volumetric flask and make up the volume with diluent. From that stock solution
take 0.1 ml of solution into 10 ml volumetric flask and make up the volume with
diluent to produce 10µg/ml solution. The working concentration of Take 100 mg of
Cobicistat in 100 ml volumetric flask and make the volume
with diluent to produce 1 mg/ml
Calibration curve standards and
quality control samples preparation in human plasma:
Screened K2EDTA human plasma batches (n=6) including
one hemolytic and lipemic plasmas were pooled and used
to prepare calibration standards and quality control samples. CC standards were prepared by spiking (50µl of
working standard in to 950 µl of blank plasma) respective CC working solutions in
plasma. Similarly, QC samples were also prepared in a similar way to produce QC
samples in plasma. These samples were prepared in a bulk and an aliquot of 500 µl
of CCs and QCs were pipetted in to prelabelled micro centrifuge tubes and stored at –70±10 °C in
a deep freezer.
Calibration samples were prepared at a concentration of
0.01, 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 and 10.0µg/ml. Similarly, QC samples were at
concentrations of 0.01 (QC-LLOQ), 0.1 (low; QC-L), 1.0 (middle; QC–M1),) and 5.0
µg/ml (high; QC-H).
Extraction
protocol:
Take 250µl of plasma and 50µl of internal standard ,10µl
of Cobicstat from the spiking solutions of both into a centrifuging tube and add 2 ml of acetonitrile go for cyclomixer for
15 sec. Then vertex for 2 min and finally centrifuge for 3 min at 3200 rpm speed.
After the centrifugation collect the organic layer and directly inject 10 µl into
HPLC(liquid-liquid extraction).
Validation 6-15:
System suitability test:
System suitability6,7 (SST)
experiment was performed by injecting 6 consecutive injections using aqueous sample
equivalent to QC-M2 concentration. SST was performed at the start of the method
validation and on each day as a first experiment.
Specificity:
The selectivity of the HPLC-UV method was established by
screening the standard blanks of different lots of human plasma. For selectivity
experiment ten different lots of plasma including one hemolytic and lipemic were screened for the specificity experiment.
Sensitivity:
The sensitivity8,9 of the method was evaluated by analyzing
6 LLOQ samples (0.01 µg/ml).
Linearity:
The linearity of the method was determined by using a 1/ x2 weighted least square regression
analysis of standard plots associated with eight-point standard curve. All the 3
calibration curves analyzed were found to be linear for the standards concentration
ranging from 0.01 to 10.0 µg/ml.
Precision and Accuracy:
The precision (% CV) of the RP-HPLC method was evaluated
by analyzing 6 replicates at different concentration levels corresponding to QC-LLOQ,
QC-L, QC-M1, QC-M2 and QC-H during the course of validation. The accuracy of the
assay was defined as the absolute value of the ratio of the calculated mean values
of the LOQ, low, middle and high quality control samples to their respective nominal
value, expressed as percentage.
Recovery:
The % mean recoveries were determined by measuring the
responses of the extracted plasma quality control samples against un-extracted quality
control samples at QC-L, QC-M1, QC-M2 and QC-H levels.
Ruggedness precision and accuracy:
Ruggedness was performed by analyzing one P&A batch
(PA Batch-III) using different column and different analyst.
Stabilities studies:
Short term stock solution stability:
Short term stock solution stability of the Cobicistat and the IS was determined by using aqueous standard
equivalent to QC-M2 concentration for the Cobicistat and
working concentration for the IS after storage of stock solution over a period of
6 hours at room temperature.
Long term stock solution stability:
Long term stock solution stability for the Cobicistat and the IS was determined at a concentration of QC-M2
level for the analyte and working concentration for the
IS using aqueous standard solution after a storage period of 39 days at 2-8 °C in
refrigerator.
Reinjection reproducibility:
Reinjection reproducibility was performed by re injecting
the P&A-01 after a period of 70 hours which were remain kept in auto sampler
at 2-8 °C.
RESULTS:
Optimised chromatographic
conditions
|
Column: |
BDS 250, 4.6µ, 5mm |
|
Mobile phase composition: |
0.1% OPA Buffer : Acetonitrile
45:55 |
|
Flow rate : |
1 ml/min |
|
Injection volume: |
50 µl |
|
Run time: |
10 min |
|
Detection wavelength: |
210nm |
|
Column temperature: |
30 şC |
System suitability test:
The % CV for system suitability test was in the range of
0.00–5.00% for retention time and 4.00–5.48% for the area ratio (analytes area/IS area).
Selectivity:
All the investigated human plasma lots were found to be
free of significant interferences at the retention time of Cobicistat and the IS. Six plasma lots were pooled and used
as a blank matrix to prepare calibration curve standards and quality control samples.
Representative chromatograms of standard blank and blank with IS sample using pooled
plasma are shown in Fig.3 and 4, respectively.
Sensitivity:
The % CV and % mean accuracy for analyte
at LLOQ level were found to be 11.50% and 101.67% respectively. The sensitivity
results Cobicistat are summarized in the Table 1.
Linearity:
Linearity and range were estimated by using calibration
curve. By using calibration standards prepared
by spiking drug (Cobicistat) and internal standard (febuxostat) in plasma at different concentrations 0.01, 0.05,
0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 5.0 and 10.0µg/ml, the calibration graph was plotted taking
concentration of spiked plasma on x-axis and peak area on y-axis. All the 3 calibration
curves analyzed were found to be linear for the standards concentration ranging
from 0.01 to 10.0µg/ml. A representative calibration curve is shown in Figure.10,
which is obtained during the first precision and accuracy batch. The back calculated
concentration data obtained for 3 calibration curves are summarized in the Table.2. .
Precision and Accuracy:
Intra batch precision (intra day):
The % CV of back calculated concentrations of all quality
control samples analyzed in a single day at QC-L, QC-LLOQ, QC-M1, and QC-H concentration levels were ranged from
5.42% to 8.17%.
The % mean accuracy of back calculated concentrations for
all quality control samples analyzed in a single day at QC-L, QC-M1, LLOQ and QC-H
concentration levels were ranged from 98.33%
to 100.71%.
Recovery:
The % mean recovery of Cobicistat
at QC-L, QC-M1, and QC-H levels was found to be 47.15%, 63.81%, and 51.20%, respectively.
Overall % mean recovery of analyte and % CV at all QC
levels was found to be 54.055% and 16.08%, respectively. The recovery of Cobicistat at four different QC levels is summarized in the
Table.4.
The overall % mean recovery for the internal standard was
found to be 64.91%. The mean recovery of Febuxostat d6
is summarized in Table.5.
Ruggedness precision and accuracy:
Ruggedness was performed by analyzing one P&A batch
(PA Batch-III) using different column and different analyst. The results were summarized
in Table.6.
Stabilities:
Stability was assessed by comparing the stability stock
solution(short term stock solution stability at room temperature for 6 hours) against
the freshly prepared stock solution. The % mean stability of LQC and HQC Cobicistat was found to be 100.50% and 101.73% respectively.
The results were summarized in Table.7.
The % mean stability of LQC and HQC Cobicistat
long term stock solution stability at 2-80c for 39 days was found to
be 96.57 and 99.17% respectively.
Reinjection reproducibility:
The % CV of back calculated concentrations for HQC, MQC1,
LQC, LLOQ QC was in between 5.12% to 10.79% respectively.
The % mean accuracy of back calculated concentrations for
HQC, MQC1, LQC, LLOQ QC was in between 99.74% to 108.33 % respectively.
Fig. 3: A representative chromatogram of standard blank of Cobicistat
Fig. 4: A representative chromatogram of standard zero (Blank+IS)
Fig. 5: A representative
chromatogram of QC-LLOQ of Cobicistat.
Fig. 6: A representative
chromatogram of QC-L of Cobicistat
Fig.7: A representative
chromatogram of QC-M1 of Cobicistat.
Fig.8: A representative
chromatogram of QC-M2 of Cobicistat.
Fig. 9: A representative
chromatogram of QC-H of Cobicistat.
Fig.10: A typical
calibration curve of Cobicistat.
Table
1: Sensitivity –Cobicistat
|
Replicate
no. |
LLOQ(nominal
concentration) 0.010µg/ml |
|
nominal
concentration range (0.008-0.012µg/ml) |
|
|
Calculated
concentration (µg/ml) |
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
0.009 0.010 0.012 0.011 0.009 0.010 6 0.0102 0.00117 11.50 101.67 |
Table 2:
Linearity data for cobicistat
|
Acquisition
Batch
ID |
Std1 |
Std2 |
Std3 |
Std4 |
Std5 |
Std6 |
Std7 |
Std8 |
||
|
Nominal
Concentration (µg/ml) |
||||||||||
|
0.010 |
0.050 |
0.100 |
0.500 |
1.000 |
2.000 |
5.000 |
10.000 |
|||
|
Nominal
Concentration Range(µg/ml) |
||||||||||
|
0.008-0.012 |
0.043-0.058 |
0.085-0.115 |
0.425-0.575 |
0.850-1.150 |
1.700-2.300 |
4.250-5.750 |
8.500-11.500 |
|||
|
Back
Calculated Concentration(µg/ml) |
||||||||||
|
P AND A1 P AND A2 P AND A3 n mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
0.009 0.011 0.010 3 0.010 0.001 10.00 100.0 |
0.049 0.052 0.050 3 0.0503 0.0015 3.03 100.67 |
0.089 0.099 0.110 3 0.0993 0.0105 10.57 99.33 |
0.510 0.469 0.512 3 0.4970 0.0242 4.88 99.40 |
0.895 0.965 1.005 3 0.9550 0.0556 5.83 95.50 |
1.986 2.003 2.125 3 2.0380 0.0758 3.72 101.90 |
4.695 5.412 5.025 3 5.0440 0.3588 7.11 100.88 |
8.965 10.965 11.025 3 10.3183 1.17240 11.36 103.18 |
||
Table 3: Accuracy
and precision data for each individual run of cobicistat
|
Acquisition
Batch ID |
HQC |
MQC1 |
LQC |
LLOQ QC |
|
|
Nominal
Concentration (µg/ml) |
|||||
|
5.000 |
1.000 |
0.100 |
0.010 |
||
|
Nominal
Concentration Range(µg/ml) |
|||||
|
4.250-5.750 |
0.850-1.150 |
0.0850-0.115 |
0.008-0.012 |
||
|
n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
4.986 5.215 5.362 4.912 4.856 4.901 6 5.0387 0.20336 4.04 100.77 4.669 4.900 5.024 5.028 5.009 5.698 6 5.0547 0.34374 6.80 101.09 5.363 5.258 4.696 4.715 5.237 4.811 6 5.0132 0.30400 6.06 100.26 |
0.965 0.935 1.102 1.095 1.125 1.120 6 1.0570 0.08415 7.96 105.70 0.998 0.915 0.927 1.025 0.985 1.085 6 0.9892 0.06313 6.38 98.92 1.106 1.125 1.105 1.102 1.008 1.139 6 1.0975 0.04612 4.20 109.75 |
0.098 0.102 0.115 0.093 0.096 0.093 6 0.0995 0.00835 8.40 99.47 0.101 0.112 0.095 0.097 0.090 0.092 6 0.0980 0.00785 8.01 98.02 0.096 0.105 0.108 0.110 0.097 0.091 6 0.1012 0.00757 7.49 101.17 |
0.009 0.010 0.010 0.011 0.010 0.009 6 0.0098 0.00075 7.64 98.00 0.010 0.009 0.010 0.009 0.011 0.010 6 0.0097 0.00088 9.08 97.00 0.010 0.009 0.011 0.009 0.010 0.011 6 0.0100 0.00089 8.94 100.00 |
|
|
Between
Batch Precision and Accuracy |
|||||
|
n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
18 5.0355 0.27277 5.42 100.71 |
18 1.0479 0.07743 7.39 104.79 |
18 0.0996 0.00757 7.60 99.55 |
18 0.0098 0.00080 8.17 98.33 |
|
Table 4:
Recovery data of cobicistat
|
Replicate
no. |
HQC |
MQC1 |
LQC |
|||
|
Un extracted response |
extracted response |
Un extracted response |
extracted response |
Un extracted response |
extracted response |
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 n Mean SD %CV |
522548 523258 523328 521748 523365 528569 6 523803 2417.74 0.46 |
263269 266987 266178 272203 271230 269325 6 268199 3356.94 1.25 |
91562 94558 94158 91456 94569 94518 6 93470 1527.08 1.63 |
59569 59985 59226 59593 59985 59523 6 59647 293.29 0.49 |
30268 30265 30698 30885 30222 30269 6 30435 283.33 0.93 |
14632 14547 14021 14398 14479 14023 6 14350 265.50 1.85 |
|
%Mean Recovery |
51.20 |
63.81 |
47.15 |
|||
|
overall% Mean Recovery overall SD overall %CV |
54.055 8.6904 16.08 |
|||||
Table 5:
Recovery- febuxostat-D6 (IS)
|
S.NO. |
Un extracted Area Ratio |
Extracted Area Ratio |
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 n Mean SD %CV |
405689 412568 395684 402535 395624 389586 6 400281.0 8276.48 2.07 |
264854 265487 241154 256147 265894 265335 6 259811.8 9865.85 3.80 |
|
%Mean Recovery |
64.91 |
|
Table
6: Ruggedness data
|
|
HQC |
MQC1 |
LQC |
LLOQ QC |
|
|
Nominal
Concentration (µg/ml) |
|||||
|
5.000 |
5.000 |
5.000 |
5.000 |
||
|
Nominal
Concentration Range(µg/ml) |
|||||
|
4.250-5.750 |
4.250-5.750 |
4.250-5.750 |
4.250-5.750 |
||
|
Calculated
Concentration(µg/ml) |
|||||
|
Different column n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
4.598 4.985 5.236 5.145 5.412 5.365 6 5.1235 0.30000 5.86 102.47 |
0.896 0.914 0.966 1.145 1.025 1.005 6 0.9918 0.09016 9.09 99.18 |
0.097 0.114 0.106 0.110 0.092 0.086 6 0.1008 0.01093 10.84 100.83 |
0.009 0.010 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.009 6 0.0102 0.00117 11.50 101.67 |
|
|
Different analyst n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
5.124 4.689 4.985 4.478 4.966 4.856 6 4.8496 0.23283 4.80 96.99 |
1.110 1.089 0.938 0.987 0.954 0.896 6 0.9957 0.08585 8.62 99.57 |
0.098 0.106 0.108 0.093 0.097 0.113 6 0.1026 0.00761 7.42 102.57 |
0.008 0.009 0.010 0.011 0.011 0.009 6 0.0097 0.00121 12.53 96.67 |
|
|
Replicate no. |
HQC |
LQC |
|
Nominal Concentration (µg/ml) |
||
|
5.000 |
0.100 |
|
|
Nominal Concentration Range(µg/ml) |
||
|
4.250-5.750 |
0.085-0.115 |
|
|
Calculated Concentration(µg/ml) |
||
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
4.365 4.968 4.991 5.256 5.612 5.326 6 5.0863 0.42567 8.37 101.73 |
0.096 0.112 0.103 0.091 0.092 0.109 6 0.1005 0.00887 8.83 100.50 |
Table 8: Long term stock solution stability (at
2 – 8 °C for 39 days)
|
Replicate no. |
HQC |
LQC |
|||
|
Nominal Concentration (µg/ml) |
|||||
|
5.000 |
0.100 |
||||
|
Nominal Concentration Range(µg/ml) |
|||||
|
4.250-5.750 |
0.085-0.115 |
||||
|
Comparision
sample |
Stability sample |
Comparision
sample |
Stability sample |
||
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
5.321 4.626 5.126 5.695 5.015 4.985 6 5.1279 0.35906 7.00 102.56 |
4.398 4.698 5.698 5.125 5.326 5.267 6 5.0853 0.46690 9.18 101.71 |
0.099 0.102 0.112 0.114 0.109 0.109 6 0.1075 0.00582 5.42 107.50 |
0.097 0.100 0.111 0.103 0.113 0.100 6 0.1038 0.00666 6.42 103.81 |
|
|
%Mean stability |
99.17 |
96.57 |
|||
Table
9: Reinjection reproducibility results - Cobicistat for
70 hours
|
Replicate no. |
HQC |
MQC1 |
LQC |
LLOQ QC |
|
Nominal
Concentration (µg/ml) |
||||
|
5.000 |
1.000 |
0.100 |
0.010 |
|
|
Nominal
Concentration Range(µg/ml) |
||||
|
4.250-5.750 |
0.850-1.150 |
0.0850-0.115 |
0.008-0.012 |
|
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 n Mean SD %CV %Mean Accuracy |
4.695 5.214 5.363 4.966 4.895 4.789 6 4.9869 0.25529 5.12 99.74 |
0.895 0.984 1.125 1.112 1.025 0935 6 1.0127 0.09310 9.19 101.27 |
0.097 0.100 0.112 0.110 0.113 0.093 6 0.041 0.00862 8.28 104.10 |
0.009 0.012 0.011 0.010 0.011 0.012 6 0.0108 0.00117 10.79 108.33 |
DISCUSSION
AND CONCLUSION:
RP-HPLC methods have been reported for the determination
of Cobicistat with other steroids in serum and water effluents. But there were no reports
available for the determination of Cobicistat alone in
human plasma. Many formulations available for Cobicistat
alone in the market and should have a proper analytical method to quantify the drug
concentrations in plasma. Hence a simple and rapid RP-HPLC has been proposed for
the determination of Cobicistat in human plasma. This
method employed commercially available Febuxostat as an
internal standard. Chromatography was performed on inertsil
BDS (250mm×4.6mm, 5µm), Orthophosphoric acid: Acetonitrile (45:55 v/v) delivered at a flow rate of 1.0 ml/min.
Precision and accuracy results over 3 analytical batches are meeting acceptance
criteria. Stock solutions were stable for 6 hours at room temperature and 39 days
at 2-8°C in refrigerator. Cobicistat was stable at variety
of stability studies namely long term stock
solution stability (at 2-8°C for 39 days), auto sampler stability (73 hours),
bench top stability (13 hours), re-injection stability (70 hours). Real time sample concentrations above the calibration
curve range can be quantified by half and quarter dilution with blank plasma.
A rapid, sensitive and highly
selective method for the determination of Cobicistat in
human plasma was developed, using RP-HPLC technique. This method can be used for
analysis of large number of samples with greater precision during pharmacokinetic
and bioequivalence studies. The assay method is more selective than previously reported
HPLC, RIA and allows for a much higher sample throughput due to the short chromatographic
time and simple sample preparation. As robust RP-HPLC instrument performance was
observed and hence this method is an excellent analytical option for rapid quantification
of Cobicistat in human plasma. The method was used successfully
for the determination of plasma drug concentrations in human plasma samples under
fasting conditions.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
Authors are thankful to University College
of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Acharya Nagarjuna University, Nagarjuna nagar,
Guntur, Andhra Pradesh, India.for providing necessary analytical facilities
REFERENCES:
1.
Chandni Saha, Md. Nazeeruddin
Ahmed, development and validation of a simple UV spectrophotometric method for the
determination of cobicistat in its bulk form, Indo American
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 2014. ISSN NO: 2231-6876, pg no 5792-5796.
2.
Shiny Ganji,
D. Satyavati, Development and validation of RP-HPLC method
for the analysis of Cobicistat and related impurities
in bulk and pharmaceutical dosage forms, Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 2015; Vol. 5: Issue
1, Pg 1-8.
3.
D. Sindu
Priya and D. Gowri Sankar, Stability indicating RP-HPLC Method Development and
Validation for Simultaneous Determination of Atazanavir
and Cobicistat in Bulk and Pharmaceutical Formulation,
Am. J. Pharm Tech Res. 2015; 6(1).
4.
Raghu Ram Jampala, V. Kiran
Kumar, Development and Application of Liquid Chromatographic Method for Simultaneous
Determination of Elvitegravir, Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate, Emtricitabine, and Cobicistat in Fixed
Dosage Form, Pharmaceutical Methods Vol 5, Issue 1, Jan-Jun
2014.
5.
Swati S. Pardhi, Kiran B.A
her, development and validation of uv spectrophotometric
method for the estimation of elvitegravir (evg) in bulk
and pharmaceutical formulations. IJPSR, ISSN:
0975-9492 Vol 6 No 01 Jan 2015(213-218).
6. N. Tamilselvi, Dona Sara Kurian. Bioanalytical method development and validation of pirfenidone by RPHPLC method and its application to the determination
of drug food interaction study in wister rats., IJPBR,
ISSN : 0976-285X Vol 3 Issue 3 Jun-Jul 2012(132-142).
7. A. Kirthi1, R. Shanmugam, M. Shanti Prathyusha1,
D. Jamal Basha, a review on bioanalytical
method development and validation by RP–HPLC, Journal of Global Trends in Pharmaceutical
Sciences, 5(4) -(2014) 2265-2271
8. A. B. Pharne, B. Santhakumari, A. S. Ghemud, H. K. Jain, M. J. Kulkarni,
Bioanalytical method development and validation of vildagliptin a novel dipeptidyl peptidase
iv inhibitor by RP-HPLC method, International journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical
Sciences, Issue 3 - 0975-1491,
9. Senthil Rajan Dharmalingam, Srinivasan Ramamurthy, A Simple HPLC Bioanalytical
Method for the Determination of Doxorubicin Hydrochloride in Rat Plasma: Application
to Pharmacokinetic Studies, Tropical
Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, March 2014; 13 (3): 409-415.
10. S. Jayaseelan, S. Suresh, G. Sathishkumar,
V. Sekar, P. Perumal, bioanalytical method development and validation of lamivudine by rp-hplc method, International
Journal of ChemTech Research, ISSN : 0974-4290, Vol.2,
No.1, pp 163-167, Jan-Mar 2010.
11. Surajpal Verma, Pooja Mullick,
Md. Sleem Bhatt, Nadeem Siddiqui, Ozair Alam, Indu Bala
and Suroor A. Khan, Bioanalytical
method development and validation for the simultaneous estimation of lamivudine and stavudine in human
plasma by hplc, Acta Poloniae Pharmaceutica ń Drug Research,
Vol. 67 No. 4 pp. 429-437, 2010 ISSN 0001-6837.
12. Pranay Wal, Brijesh Kumar, Anil Bhandari, A. K. Rai, Ankita Wal, Bioanalytical
Method Development –Determination of Drugs in Biological Fluids, Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology
Vol. 2 (10), 2010,333-347.
13. Vishal. P. Awari, Subramania Nainar Meyyanathan, Yamjala. Karthik, Natarajan Jawahar, HPLC Method Development
and Validation of Rizatriptan in Rabbit Plasma, J. Pharm.
Sci. & Res. Vol. 6(1), 2014, 24 – 26.
14. T. Manish K development
and validation of HPLCUV method for the estimation of levofloxacin
in human plasmamara, gurrala
Srikant HB, J. Venkateshwar
Rao, CKRS. Sambasiva Rao, International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences,
ISSN- 0975-1491,Vol 3, Issue 2, 2011.
15.
Santosh Kumar Bhardwaj, K. Dwivedia and D. D. Agarwala, A Review: HPLC Method Development and Validation,
International Journal of Analytical and Bioanalytical
Chemistry, ISSN-2231-5012, 2015; 5(4): 76-81.
Received on 17.07.2016 Accepted on 20.10.2016
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Ana.
2016; 6(4): 216-226.
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5675.2016.00033.8