Simultaneous
Estimation of Lamotrigine and Clozapine
by Simultaneous equation method in their Synthetic Mixture which use in
Schizophrenia
Priyanka
P. Atodariya*, Hasumati A.
Raj, Vineet C. Jain
Shree Dhanvantary Pharmacy Collage Kim, Surat,
Gujarat, India
*Corresponding Author E-mail: atodariya.priyanka@yahoo.com,
drharaj@yahoo.com
ABSTRACT:
Two simple spectroscopic methods have been developed for simultaneous
estimation of Lamotrigine and Clozapine
in synthetic mixture. Simultaneous equation method involves the measurement of
absorption at two wavelengths 308 nm (λmax for Lamotrigine) and 259.60 nm (λmax
for Clozapine). The method was found linear between the
range of 1-5 µg/ml for Lamotrigine and 6-30 µg/ml for
Clozapine for method .The accuracy and precision was
determined and validated statistically. Both the method showed good
reproducibility and recovery with %RSD less than 1.The method was found to be rapid,
specific, precise and accurate and can be successfully applied for the routine
analysis for Lamotrigine and Clozapine
in bulk and combined dosage form.
KEYWORDS: Lamotrigine, Clozapine,
Simultaneous equation Method.
INTRODUCTION:
Lamotrigine is an
epileptic drug which is believed to suppress seizures by inhibiting the release
of excitatory neurotransmitters[1].
IUPAC name of Lamotrigine is 3, 5-diamino-6-2, 3(dichlorophenyl)-1, 2, 4 triazine[2].Clozapine is benzodiazepine derivative and use in treatment
of schizophrenia[3]. The IUPAC name of Clozapine
is 8-Chloro-11-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-5H-dibenzo [b, e] [1, 4] diazepine [4]. It acts by inhibiting presyneptic voltage sensitive sodium channels and
excitatory neurotransmitter release .
Dopamine is one of the important neurotransmitter and plays a significant role
in the functioning of central nervous system [5]. The inhibition of
dopamine transmission through blockade of dopamine D2 receptors is considered
to be essential for antipsychotic efficacy, but it is postulated that
modulation of glutamate transmission may be equally important. In support of
this, symptoms similar to schizophrenia can be induced in healthy volunteers
using N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) antagonist drugs
that are also known to enhance glutamate transmission.[6]
Furthermore, Lamotrigine, which can modulate glutamate release, may add
to or synergise with atypical antipsychotic drugs,
some of which may themselves modulate glutamate transmission [7].So,
Lamotrigine use with Clozapine
in treatment of schizophrenia.
Chemical
structure of Lamotrigine and Clozapine
Fig-1 Lamotrigine[8]
Fig-2 Clozapine[9]
MATERIAL AND METHODS:
Apparatus
and
instrument:
A double beam UV/Visible spectrophotometer (Shimadzu model 2450, Japan)
with spectral width of 2 nm, 1 cm quartz cells
was used to measure absorbance of
all the solutions.
Spectra were
automatically obtained by UV-Probe system software.
An analytical balance (Sartorius CD2250,
Gottingen, Germany) was used for
weighing the
samples.
Sonicator (D120/2H, TRANS-O-SONIC)
Class ‘B’ volumetric glassware were used
(Borosilicate)
All instruments and glass wares
were calibrated.
Reagents and material:
Lamotrigine raw material was received as gift sample from Praveen
Laboratories.
Clozapine raw
material was received as gift sample from ZCl
Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd.
Methanol AR Grade (Rankem), Distilled Water, 0.1 N HCl,
0.1 N NaOH were used for development purpose.
For
simultaneous equation method preparation of standard solution:
Standard solution of Lamotrigine
(LAMO):
Preparation
of stock solution of LAMO:
Accurately weighed quantity
of LAMO 10 mg was transferred to 100ml volumetric flask, dissolved, and diluted
up to mark with methanol to give a stock solution having strength 100µg/ml.
Standard
solution of Clozapine (CLO):
Preparation
of stock solution of CLO:
Accurately weighed quantity
of CLO 10 mg was transferred into 100 ml volumetric flask, dissolved and
diluted up to mark with methanol to give a stock solution having strength
100µg/ml.
Preparation
of Standard Mixture Solution (LAMO + CLO):
1ml of standard stock
solution of LAMO (100μg/ml) and 6 ml of standard stock solution of CLO
(100μg/ml) was pipette out into two 10ml volumetric flasks and volume was
adjusted to the mark with methanol to get 10μg/ml of LAMO and 60μg/ml
of CLO.
Preparation
of test solution:
The preparation of
synthetic mixture was as per patent:
·
Lamotrigine: 10mg
·
Clozapine: 60mg
·
Sodium Starch Glycolate: 10 mg
·
Starch: 10 mg
·
Magnesium stearate: 10 mg
All the excipients
were mixed in 100ml volumetric flask then make up the volume with methanol and sonicated for 15min.after sonicate
make up the volume up to 100 ml with methanol. The solution was filtered
through Whatman filter paper No. 42. Finally the solution had concentration
100μg/ml for LAMO and 600μg/ml for CLO.
Validation
of proposed method:
Parameters to be considered
for the validation of methods are:
1) Linearity
and
Range:
Procedure:
● Calibration curves for Lamotrigine:
The linearity response was
determined by analyzing 6 independent levels of calibration curve in the range
of 1-5μg/ml OF LAMO .This series
consisted of five concentrations of standard LAMO solution ranging from 1-5 μg /ml. The solutions were prepared by pipetting out Standard LAMO stock solution (0.1ml, 0.2ml,
0.3ml, 0.4ml, 0.5ml) was transferred into a series of 10 ml volumetric flask
and volume was adjusted up to mark with Methanol. A zero order spectrum,
measured the absorbance at 308 nm against a reagent blank solution (Methanol).
● Calibration curve for Clozapine:
The linearity response was
determined by analyzing 6 independent levels of calibration curve in the range
of 6-30 μg /ml CLOZ. This series consisted of
five concentrations of standard CLOZ solution ranging from 6-30 μg/ml. The solutions were prepared by pipetting out Standard CLOZ stock solution (0.6ml, 1.2ml,
1.8ml, 2.4ml, and 3.0ml) was transferred into a series of 10 ml volumetric
flask and volume was adjusted up to mark with Methanol. A zero order spectrum measured the absorbance
at 259.50 nm against a reagent blank solution (Methanol).
2) Precision:
I. Intraday precision:
Procedure:
The precision of the developed method was assessed by analyzing samples of the same batch in nine
determinations with three Standard solutions containing
concentrations
1,3,5μg/ml for LAMO and
6,18,30 μg/ml
for CLO and three replicate (n=3)each on same day.
For zero order spectra was measured
at 308 nm for LAMO and 259.50 nm for CLO.
The % RSD value
of the results corresponding to
the absorbance
was expressed for intra-day precision.
II. Interday
Precision:
Procedure:
The precision of the developed method was assessed by analyzing samples of the same batch in nine
determinations with three Standard solutions containing
concentrations
1,3,5 μg/ml for LAMO and
6,18,30μg/ml for CLO and
three replicate (n=3)each on different day.
For zero order spectra was
measured at
308 nm for LAMO and
259.50 nm for CLO.
The % RSD value
of the results corresponding to
the absorbance
was expressed for inter-day precision.
3) Accuracy:
It was determined by calculating the recovery of LAMO and CLO by standard addition method.
Accuracy was done by adding
both API standard solution and test solution. Total concentration was as per
table.1
Table 1:
Solution for accuracy study
Concentration
of Formulation
(µg/ml) |
Concentration
of API in spiking solution (µg/ml) |
Total concentration of (μg/ml) |
|||
LAMO |
CLO |
LAMO |
CLO |
LAMO |
CLO |
2 |
12 |
1.8 |
10 |
3.8 |
22 |
2 |
12 |
2 |
12 |
4 |
24 |
2 |
12 |
2.2 |
14 |
4.2 |
26 |
Procedure:
Each solution was
taken and diluted with methanol up to 10ml volumetric flask and scanned between 200nm to 400nm against methanol
as
a blank. The amount of LAMO and CLO was
calculated at
each level and % recoveries were computed.
4) Limit of
detection and quantitation:
The Limit of detection and quantitation of the developed method was assessed by
analyzing ten replicates of standard solutions containing concentrations 1 μg/ml for LAMO and 6 μg/ml
of CLO.
The LOD
and LOQ were calculated as LOD = 3.3σ/S, and LOQ = 10σ/S, where
σ is the standard deviation of the lowest standard concentration and S is
the slope of the standard curve.% RSD was calculated.
5) Robustness and ruggedness:
Robustness and Ruggedness
of the method was determined by subjecting the method to slight change in the
method condition, individually, the:
Change in Stock Solution
Preparation,
Stock-1(10mg LAMO in 100ml
methanol-100μg/ml and10mg CLO in 100ml methanol –100 μg/ml)
Stock-2(10mg LAMO in 50ml
methanol-200μg/ml and 10mg CLO in 50ml methanol - 200 μg/ml)
Change in instrument
(UV-Vis Spectrophotometer model 1800 and 2450),
Three replicates were made
for the concentration (1, 3, 5 μg/ml of LAMO and
6, 18, 30 μg/ml of CLO) with different stock
solution preparation.
5) Analysis of EDA
and
ARG in synthetic mixture (assay):
Composition
of synthetic mixture:
The preparation of
synthetic mixture was as per patent:
Lamotrigine : 10mg
Clozapine :60mg
Sodium
Starch Glycolate : 10 mg
Starch : 10 mg
Magnesium stearate :
10 mg
All the excipients
were mixed in 100ml volumetric flask then make up the volume with methanol and sonicated for 15min.after sonicate
make up the volume up to 100 ml with methanol. The solution was filtered
through Whatman filter
paper No.
42. Finally the solution had concentration 100μg/ml
for LAMO and 600μg/ml
for CLO.
RESULT AND
DISCUSSION:
Selection of wavelength and method development
for
determination of
lamotrigine and
clozapine
Fig -3
Overlain zero order spectra of Lamotrigine and Clozapine
The Simultaneous Equation Method Can be done as per Zero Order Spectra
was overlay.
Spectra were taken in solvent Methanol in the range of 1-5 µg/ml for
LAMO and 6-30 µg/ml for CLOZ.
Validation
parameters:
1. Linearity and
Range:
The Zero
order spectra (fig.7.1) showed linear absorbance at 308 nm
for LAMO (1-5 µg/ml) and 259.50 nm for CLO (6-30
µg/ml) with correlation coefficient (r2) of 0.998 and 0.998
for LAMO and CLO, respectively.
This method obeyed beer’s law in the concentration range
1-5 µg/ml and
6-30µg/ml
for LAMO and CLO, respectively. (Table 7.2)
Correlation coefficient (r2) form calibration curve of LAMO and CLO was found to be 0.998and 0.998, respectively (figure 7.2)
The regression line equation for
LAMO and CLO are as
following,
y =
0.0362X+0.0044 for LAMO_____________ (1)
y = 0.0641 + 0.0294 for CLO
_______________ (2)
Table 2:Calibration data for LAMO
and
CLO at 308 nm and 259.50
nm,
respectively. *(n=6)
Lamotrigine Conc. |
Absorbance ± SD* |
Clozapine Conc. |
Absorbance ± SD* |
1 |
0.042 ± 0.0012 |
6 |
0.436 ± 0.0019 |
2 |
0.076 ± 0.0012 |
12 |
0.796 ±0.0011 |
3 |
0.113 ± 0.0006 |
18 |
1.155 ±0.0016 |
4 |
0.146 ± 0.0016 |
24 |
1.548 ± 0.0008 |
5 |
0.188 ±0.0021 |
30 |
1.984 ±0.0010 |
Fig-4 Calibration data for LAMO and CLO at
307 nm and 360 nm, respectively.*(n=6)
Table -3: Regression analysis
data and validation parameter
Sr. No. |
Statistical Parameter |
Lamotrigine |
Clozapine |
1. |
Concentration
(µg/ml) |
1-5 µg/ml |
6-30 µg/ml |
2. |
Straight line equation |
Y=0.0362x+0.0044 |
Y=0.0641x+0.0294 |
Slope |
0.0362 |
0.0641 |
|
Intercept |
0.0044 |
0.0294 |
|
3. |
Correlation coefficient (r2) |
0.998 |
0.998 |
Mixture
linearity [for simultaneous equation]:
Fig-5 Mixture Linearity
in range of 1-5 µg/ml of LAMO and 6-30 µg/ml
CLO (1:6 Ratio)
Table-4
Sr.no |
Concentration in mixture (LAMO:CLO) (1:6)µg/ml |
Absorbance ( 308 nm) |
Absorbance (259.50 nm) |
1 |
1 : 6 |
0.231 |
0.521 |
2 |
2 : 12 |
0.432 |
0.916 |
3 |
3 : 18 |
0.642 |
1.446 |
4 |
4 : 24 |
0.844 |
1.801 |
5 |
5 : 30 |
1.027 |
2.243 |
Fig-6 Fig-7
2. Precision:
I. Intraday precision:
The
precision of the developed method was assessed by analyzing combined standard
solution containing three different concentrations 1 ,3, 5 μg/ml for LAMO and
6,18,30 μg/ml for CLO. Three replicate (n=3) each on same
day for intraday.
II. Interday Precision:
The precision of the
developed method was assessed by analyzing combined standard solution containing three different concentrations 1, 3, 5 μg/ml for LAMO and
6,18,30 μg/ml for CLO. Three replicate (n=3) each on
different day for interday precision.
3. Accuracy:
• Accuracy of the method was determined by recovery study from synthetic
mixture at three levels
(80%, 100%, and 120%) of standard addition.
• The % recovery values are tabulated
in Table 7.1.5 and
7.1.6
• Percentage recovery for LAMO
and
CLO by this method was found in the range
of 99.96 to 101.65%and 99.77-101.90%,
respectively,
• The value of %RSD within the limit indicated that the method is accurate and
percentage recovery shows
that there is no interference from
the
excipients.
Table-5: Intraday precision data for estimation of LAMO
and
CLO *(n=3)
Precision |
Conc. |
LAMO (308 nm) |
Conc. |
CLO (259.50nm) |
Intraday (n=3) |
||||
Abs. ±% RSD |
1µg/ml |
0.232±
0.53 |
6 µg/ml |
0.522 ±
0.23 |
3 µg/ml |
0.642 ±
0.26 |
18 µg/ml |
1.445 ±
0.19 |
|
5 µg/ml |
1.025 ±
0.25 |
30 µg/ml |
2.244 ±
0.11 |
Table-6: Interday precision data for estimation of LAMO
and
CLO *(n=3)
Precision |
Conc. |
LAMO(308 nm) |
Conc. |
CLO(259.50nm) |
Interday (n=3) |
||||
Abs. ± % RSD |
1 µg/ml |
0.234 ±
0.60 |
6 µg/ml |
0.535 ±
0.84 |
3 µg/ml |
0.644 ±
0.31 |
18 µg/ml |
1.456 ±
0.28 |
|
5 µg/ml |
1.026 ±
0.24 |
30 µg/ml |
2.244 ±
0.12 |
Table 7:
Recovery data of LAMO *
and CLO* (n=3)
Initial conc. ( µg/ml) |
Level of recovery |
Quantity of Std. Added (µg/ml) |
Total Amount (µg/ml) |
Result of recovery study |
||||||
Total Quantity Found* (µg/ml)±
%RSD |
% recovery ± %RSD |
|||||||||
LAM |
CLO |
|
LAM |
CLO |
LAM |
CLO |
LAM |
CLO |
LAM |
CLO |
2 |
12 |
0 % |
- |
- |
2 |
12 |
2.03±0.81 |
12.10±0.38 |
101.97±0.18 |
100.85±0.30 |
2 |
12 |
80 % |
1.8 |
10 |
3.8 |
22 |
3.82±0.12 |
22.21±0.03 |
100.84±0.23 |
100.91±0.38 |
2 |
12 |
100 % |
2 |
12 |
4 |
24 |
4.05±0.20 |
24.44±0.14 |
101.11±0.44 |
101.73±0.12 |
2 |
12 |
120 % |
2.2 |
14 |
4.2 |
26 |
4.23±0.44 |
26.26±0.09 |
100.54±0.28 |
100.98±0.20 |
Mean of 3 Determination |
100.74% |
101.91% |
4. Limit
of detection
and
quantitation
Table 8:
LOD and LOQ data of LAMO
and
CLO*(n=10)
Parameter |
LAMO* |
CLO* |
LOD
(µg/ml) |
0.289 |
0.108 |
LOQ
(µg/ml) |
0.877 |
0.329 |
5. Robustness and ruggedness:
Robustness and Ruggedness
of the method was determined by subjecting the method to slight change in the
method condition, individually, the:
Change in Stock Solution
Preparation,
Stock-1(10mg LAMO in 100ml
methanol-100μg/ml and10mg CLO in 100ml methanol –100 μg/ml)
Stock-2(10mg LAMO in 50ml
methanol-200μg/ml and 10mg CLO in 50ml methanol - 200 μg/ml)
Change in instrument (UV-Vis Spectrophotometer model 1800 and 2450),
Three replicates were made
for the concentration (1, 3, 5 μg/ml of LAMO and
6, 18, 30 μg/ml of CLO) with different stock
solution preparation.
Table 9:Robustness and Ruggedness data of LAMO and CLO*(n=3)
Conc. (μg/ml) |
Lamotrigine (Mean* ±% RSD)
(n=3) |
|||
Instrument |
Stock |
|||
UV-2450 |
UV-1800 |
Stock – 1 |
Stock – 2 |
|
1 |
0.232±
0.53 |
0.235±
0.52 |
0.233±
0.53 |
0.237±
0.42 |
3 |
0.642 ±
0.19 |
0.645±
0.12 |
0.643±
0.25 |
0.648±
0.12 |
5 |
1.012 ±
0.12 |
1.014±
0.16 |
1.019±
0.21 |
1.024±
0.12 |
Clozapine (Mean* ±% RSD) (n=3) |
||||
6 |
0.524 ±
0.15 |
0.520±
0.20 |
0.524±
0.23 |
0.528±
0.17 |
18 |
1.444 ±
0.08 |
1.446±
0.11 |
1.446±
0.22 |
1.447±
0.14 |
30 |
2.214 ±
0.11 |
2.216±
0.13 |
2.211±
0.11 |
2.218±
0.14 |
Table-10:
%Assay of synthetic mixture analysis (n=3)
Drugs |
Result of Synthetic Mixture Analysis (n=3) |
||
Amount of Drug |
%Assay± S.D. |
%R.S.D. |
|
LAMO |
2 µg/ml |
101.97±0.034
|
0.036 |
CLO |
12 µg/ml
|
100.85±0.037
|
0.039 |
Application
of
the proposed method for
analysis of EDA and ARG in
synthetic mixture (ASSAY)
In that synthetic mixture (100 mg) the excipient were
like Sodium Starch Glycolate,
Starch, Magnesium Stearate were taken as per
the required weight. With the Lamotrigine and Clozapine with the ratio (1:6) dissolved in Methanol with
small volume of Solvent, Sonicate for 15 min, then
make up to 100ml with methanol and filter it.
Finally the solution had
concentration 100μg/ml for LAMO and 600μg/ml for CLO.
Table 11:
Summary of validation parameter
Sr.No |
PARAMETER |
Lamotrigine |
Clozapine |
1 |
Wave
length Max. |
308 nm |
259.50
nm |
2 |
Linearity (µg/ml)
(n=6) |
1-5
µg/ml |
6-30
µg/ml |
3 |
Regression
equation |
Y=0.0362x
+ 0.0044 |
0.0641x
+ 0.0294 |
4 |
Correlation
coefficient (r2) |
0.998 |
0.998 |
5 |
Accuracy(%Recovery)
(n=3) |
100.74 %
|
101.91% |
6 |
Precision
Intra-day
(%RSD)(n=3) Inter-day
(%RSD)(n=3) |
0.25-0.53 0.24-0.60
|
0.16-0.70 0.11-0.32
|
7 |
LOD (µg/ml)
(n=10) |
0.289 |
0.108 |
8 |
LOQ
(µg/ml) (n=10) |
0.877 |
0.329 |
9 |
Robustness
and Ruggedness (%RSD) |
0.12-0.53
|
0.08-0.23
|
10 |
Assay |
101.97 %
|
100.85% |
CONCLUSION:
All the parameters
are validated as per ICH guidelines for the method validation and found to
be suitable for routine quantitative analysis in
pharmaceutical dosage forms. The
result of linearity, accuracy, precision proved to be
within limits with lower limits of
detection and quantification. Ruggedness and Robustness of method was confirmed as no significant were observed
on analysis by subjecting the method
to slight change in
the method condition. Assay
results obtained by proposed
method are in fair agreement.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:
We are sincerely thankful
to Shree Dhanvantary Pharmacy College, Kim, Surat, for providing us Infrastructure facilities and moral
support to carry out this research work. We are also thankful to SDPARC for
giving us their special time and guidance for this research work. We also
thank our colleagues for their helping
hand.
REFERENCES:
1. Goa KL, Ross SR and Chrisp P. Lamotrigine. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in
epilepsy. DRUGS, 1993
Jul; 46(1):152-76.
2. Cohen AF, Land GS, Breimer DD, Yuen BC, Winton PC and Peak AW. Lamotrigine, a new anticonvulsant: Pharmacokinetics in
normal humans. Clinical
Pharmacological Therapeutics, 1987 June; 42:535-541.
3. Manoj
G Tyagi. Estimation of Clozapine in Human Plasma by High – Performance Liquid
Chromatography and detection by UV-VIS detector. Asian Journal of Biochemical and Pharmaceutical Research, 2012
Apr; 2(2):49-53.
4. IUPAC Name available from :Clozapine _ C18H19ClN4
_ ChemSpider.htm
5. Manjunatha
JG, Kumara Swami BE, Mamatha
GP, Umesh C, Niranjana E and
Sherigara BS. Cyclic Voltammetric
Studies of Dopamine at Lamotrigine andTX-100 Modified
Carbon Paste Electrode. International
Journal of Electrochemical Science, 2009 Feb; 4:187-196.
6. James WJ. Lamotrigine in Psychiatry Pharmacology and Therapeutics.CNS Spectrum, 2005; 10(3):224-232.
7. Large CH, Webster EL and
Goff DC. The potential role of Lamotrigine
in schizophrenia. Psychopharmacology,
2005 Sep; 181(3):415-436.
8. Maurice D, Chao C. Lamotrigine: Chemistry, Bioinformation
and Pharmacokinetics. Antiepileptic
Drugs, 2002; 5:370-385.
9. Somayeh
J, Francesca F, Xu-Feng H. Structural Contribution of
antipsychotic drugs to their therapeutic profiles and metabolic side effect. Journal of Neurochemistry, 2012;
120:371-384.
10. International Conference
on Harmonization, Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Validation of Analytical
Procedures Text and Methodology, ICH Q2 (R1), 2005.
Received on 04.03.2015 Accepted on 01.04.2015
© Asian Pharma
Press All Right Reserved
Asian J. Pharm. Ana. 5(2):
April-June 2015; Page 79-85
DOI: 10.5958/2231-5675.2015.00013.7